Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Re-evaluating ‘public’ and ‘private’ in local development cultures: converging vocabularies of public good and market success in Toronto's New Urbanism

12 references·3 citing·55 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1997Different Diasporas and the Hype of Hybridity309 cited
2001Hybridity, So What?: The Anti-hybridity Backlash and the Riddles of Recognition301 cited
2010Planners as Market Actors: Rethinking State–Market Relations in Land and Property155 cited
2005Neoliberalist Planning? Re-thinking and Re-casting Sydney's Metropolitan Planning147 cited
2003Markets and the Structure of the Housebuilding Industry: An International Perspective146 cited
2003Power, Discursive Space and Institutional Practices in the Construction of Housing Problems117 cited
2009Neoliberal privatisation? Remapping the public and the private in Sydney's masterplanned residential estates99 cited
2009Urban Planners as Network Managers and Metagovernors88 cited
1980Role Choices of Urban Planners70 cited
2009Australian Urban Planners: Hybrid Roles and Professional Dilemmas?61 cited
2006New Urbanism and Sprawl47 cited
2009‘More Toronto, naturally’ but ‘too strange for Orangeville’: De-universalizing New Urbanism in Greater Toronto37 cited

Cited by

2021Early Career Planners in a Neo-liberal Age: Experience of Working in the South East of England7 cited
2017The contextualization of divergent outlooks in a Greenfield master-planned community: a pathway towards reflexivity

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

5 cited

2022Planners in Publicly Traded Firms4 cited