SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews
8 references·3 citing·44 second hop
Reliability and External Validity of AMSTAR in Assessing Quality of TCM Systematic Reviews (2012)Reliability and External Validity of AMST…Epidemiology, Quality and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Traditional Chinese Medicine Interventions Published in Chinese Journals (2011)Epidemiology, Quality and Rep…AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)AMSTAR is a reliable and vali…Methodology and Reporting Quality of Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis of Traditional Chinese Medicine (2007)Methodology and Reporting Qua…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools (2004)A systematic review of the co…A Comparison of the Quality of Cochrane Reviews and Systematic Reviews Published in Paper-Based Journals (2002)A Comparison of the Quality o…Validation of an index of the quality of review articles (1991)Validation of an index of the…Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analyses of Randomized C…“Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews in radiation oncology: A systematic review” (2017)“Assessing the methodological…Meditative Movement Therapies and Health-Related Quality-of-Life in Adults: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses (2015)Meditative Movement Therapies…Impact of choice of quality appraisal tool for systematic reviews in overviews (2014)Impact of choice of quality a…A power primer. (1992)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)Green Transition: The Frontier of the Digicircular Economy Evidenced from a Systematic Literature Review (2021)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The Quality of Meta-Analyses of Genetic Association Studies: A Review With Recommendations (2009)Risk of Bias Tool in Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses of Acupuncture in Chinese Journals (2011)Reporting and methodological qualities of published surgical meta-analyses (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (2010)Are meta-analyses of Chinese herbal medicine trials trustworthy and clinically applicable? A cross-sectional study (2014)Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in “evidence-based” Chinese journals (2014)Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses of Acupuncture (2014)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. (1992)Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis (1993)Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences (2000)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions (2011)Risks of all-cause and suicide mortality in mental disorders: a meta-review (2014)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Guidelines for Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic Tests (1994)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions (2011)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study (2009)Barriers to Screening for Intimate Partner Violence (2012)CEC’s Standards for Classifying the Evidence Base of Practices in Special Education (2014)Methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies: a survey of reviews of basic research (2006)The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: An independent appraisal* (2007)Evidence-based or biased? The quality of published reviews of evidence-based practices (2008)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2009AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews1,756 cited
  • 1987Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials1,253 cited
  • 1991Validation of an index of the quality of review articles788 cited
  • 2004A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools390 cited
  • 2002A Comparison of the Quality of Cochrane Reviews and Systematic Reviews Published in Paper-Based Journals111 cited
  • 2011Epidemiology, Quality and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Traditional Chinese Medicine Interventions Published in Chinese Journals56 cited
  • 2007Methodology and Reporting Quality of Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis of Traditional Chinese Medicine48 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Meditative Movement Therapies and Health-Related Quality-of-Life in Adults: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses99 cited
  • 2014Impact of choice of quality appraisal tool for systematic reviews in overviews19 cited
  • 2017“Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews in radiation oncology: A systematic review”18 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work