Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Indirect comparison: relative risk fallacies and odds solution

9 references·3 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
2002Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons1,204 cited
2003Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses944 cited
2005Indirect comparisons of competing interventions680 cited
2002Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes660 cited
2005Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors612 cited
2000Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses370 cited
2002Can we individualize the ‘number needed to treat’? An empirical study of summary effect measures in meta-analyses318 cited

Cited by

2012Selecting the best scale for measuring treatment effect in a network meta‐analysis: a case study in childhood nocturnal enuresis27 cited
2012Rank Reversal in Indirect Comparisons20 cited
2010Frequency of Treatment-Effect Modification Affecting Indirect Comparisons19 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work