SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Investigating the previous studies of a fraudulent author
3 references·16 citing·46 second hop
Investigating the previous studies of a fraudulent author (2005)Investigating the previous studies of a f…Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth (2005)Suspected research fraud: dif…Scientists behaving badly (2005)Scientists behaving badlyScientists behaving badly (2004)Scientists behaving badlyMethods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review (2021)Methods to assess research mi…Assessing and Raising Concerns About Duplicate Publication, Authorship Transgressions and Data Errors in a Body of Preclinical Research (2019)Assessing and Raising Concern…Why has the number of scientific retractions increased? (2015)Why has the number of scienti…La autoría científica en las áreas de ciencia y tecnología. Políticas internacionales y prácticas editoriales en las revistas científicas españolas (2014)La autoría científica en las …Scientific dishonesty—a nationwide survey of doctoral students in Norway (2013)Scientific dishonesty—a natio…Plagio y otros traspasos literario-científicos en medicina y particularmente en anestesiología (2011)Plagio y otros traspasos lite…An Analysis on the Research Ethics Cases Managed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Between 1997 and 2010 (2011)An Analysis on the Research E…Fraude y conductas inapropiadas en las publicaciones científicas (2010)Fraude y conductas inapropiad…Another kind of ethics: from corrections to retractions (2010)Another kind of ethics: from …A Retrospective Analysis of the Trend of Retracted Publications in the Field of Biomedical and Life Sciences (2010)A Retrospective Analysis of t…Susceptibility to Fraud in Systematic Reviews (2009)Susceptibility to Fraud in Sy…Data integrity, reliability and fraud in medical research (2009)Data integrity, reliability a…Comment éviter la non-conformité de la recherche biomédicale ? Recommandations aux chirurgiens (2008)Comment éviter la non-conform…What is the future of peer review? Why is there fraud in science? Is plagiarism out of control? Why do scientists do bad things? Is it all a case of: "all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"? (2007)What is the future of peer re…Misconduct by researchers and authors (2007)Misconduct by researchers and…Investigating allegations of scientific misconduct (2005)Investigating allegations of …Different Patterns of Duplicate Publication (2004)Conspiracy theories in science (2010)Correction: Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Research Ethics for Students in the Social Sciences (2020)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Discussing plagiarism in Latin American science (2009)The Air We Breathe: A Critical Look at Practices and Alternatives in the Peer-Review Process (2009)Fraud or flawed: adverse impact of fabricated or poor quality research (2010)Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics: a Publisher's Perspective (2006)A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)An analysis of the validity of retraction annotation in pubmed and the web of science (2017)Retracted publications in the biomedical literature with authors from mainland China (2017)Research ethics: a profile of retractions from world class universities (2021)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors (2016)An investigation into the impact and implications of published papers from retracted research: systematic search of affected literature (2019)Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study (1997)Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Ethics in writing: Learning to stay away from plagiarism and scientific misconduct (2011)Evidence appraisal: a scoping review, conceptual framework, and research agenda (2017)Retraction of publications: a study of biomedical journals retracting publications based on impact factor and journal category (2019)Misconduct in medical research: does it exist in Britain? (1988)Fraud and Misconduct in Medical Research (1996)Plagiarism: a scourge afflicting the Indian science. (2010)Clinical Trial Registration in Physical Therapy Journals: Recommendations from the International Society of Physiotherapy Journal Editors (2013)What Do Mentoring and Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research Have To Do with Scientists??? Misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-Funded Scientists (2007)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Authorship: attitudes and practice among Norwegian researchers (2014)Whose Paper Is It Anyway? Authorship Criteria According to Established Scholars in Health Professions Education (2018)Ideal and actual roles of university professors in academic integrity management: a comparative study (2020)The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity (2012)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Consistency of covid-19 trial preprints with published reports and impact for decision making: retrospective review (2022)Experts identified warning signs of fraudulent research: a qualitative study to inform a screening tool (2022)Protocol for the development of a tool (INSPECT-SR) to identify problematic randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of health interventions (2024)Research misconduct: the poisoning of the well (2006)Research Misconduct: The Poisoning of the Well (2006)Publication ethics: Role and responsibility of authors (2021)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Scientists behaving badly1,089 cited
  • 2005Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth125 cited
  • 2004Scientists behaving badly119 cited

Cited by

  • 2013Scientific dishonesty—a nationwide survey of doctoral students in Norway71 cited
  • 2021Methods to assess research misconduct in health-related research: A scoping review68 cited
  • 2007What is the future of peer review? Why is there fraud in science? Is plagiarism out of control? Why do scientists do bad things? Is it all a case of: "all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"?62 cited
  • 2010A Retrospective Analysis of the Trend of Retracted Publications in the Field of Biomedical and Life Sciences51 cited
  • 2009Susceptibility to Fraud in Systematic Reviews50 cited
  • 2007Misconduct by researchers and authors43 cited
  • 2005Investigating allegations of scientific misconduct42 cited
  • 2014La autoría científica en las áreas de ciencia y tecnología. Políticas internacionales y prácticas editoriales en las revistas científicas españolas40 cited
  • 2009Data integrity, reliability and fraud in medical research37 cited
  • 2010Fraude y conductas inapropiadas en las publicaciones científicas31 cited
  • 2019Assessing and Raising Concerns About Duplicate Publication, Authorship Transgressions and Data Errors in a Body of Preclinical Research

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

24 cited
  • 2010Another kind of ethics: from corrections to retractions23 cited
  • 2011Plagio y otros traspasos literario-científicos en medicina y particularmente en anestesiología20 cited
  • 2008Comment éviter la non-conformité de la recherche biomédicale ? Recommandations aux chirurgiens19 cited
  • 2011An Analysis on the Research Ethics Cases Managed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Between 1997 and 201018 cited
  • 2015Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?18 cited