Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF E‐RATER® IN SCORING TOEFL® ESSAYS

10 references·4 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1989Educational measurement, 3rd ed.2,851 cited
1952Educational Measurement1,502 cited
1997Contemporary intellectual assessment: theories, tests, and issues1,233 cited
1983Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span.605 cited
1983CONSTRUCT VALIDITY: CONSTRUCT REPRESENTATION VERSUS NOMOTHETIC SPAN322 cited
1997Analysis of the major intelligence batteries according to a proposed comprehensive Gf-Gc framework.236 cited
1998Validity and Automad Scoring: It's Not Only the Scoring144 cited
2002A Review of Strategies for Validating Computer-Automated Scoring128 cited
2004BEYOND ESSAY LENGTH: EVALUATING E‐RATER®'S PERFORMANCE ON TOEFL® ESSAYS99 cited
1997VALIDITY AND AUTOMATED SCORING: IT'S NOT ONLY THE SCORING69 cited

Cited by

2014Linguistic microfeatures to predict L2 writing proficiency: A case study in Automated Writing Evaluation44 cited
2008A DEVELOPMENTAL WRITING SCALE43 cited
2018Understanding Mean Score Differences Between the e‐rater® Automated Scoring Engine and Humans for Demographically Based Groups in the GRE® General Test29 cited
2011Determining the Evaluative Criteria of an Argumentative Writing Scale24 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work