SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Updating the OMERACT Filter: Discrimination and Feasibility
9 references·1 citing·37 second hop
Updating the OMERACT Filter: Discrimination and Feasibility (2014)Updating the OMERACT Filter: Discriminati…Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0 (2014)Developing Core Outcome Measu…The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)The COSMIN checklist for asse…Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research (2002)Many faces of the minimal cli…Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria (2002)Assessing health status and q…Looking for important change/differences in studies of responsiveness. OMERACT MCID Working Group. Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. Minimal Clinically Important Difference. (2001)Looking for important change/…The OMERACT filter for Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. (1998)The OMERACT filter for Outcom…The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (1997)The results of direct and ind…Measurement of health status (1989)Measurement of health statusClinimetrics (1987)ClinimetricsHow to Choose Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT 11 Approves Filter 2.0 (2014)How to Choose Core Outcome Me…The Costs and Effects of Behavioral Programs in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (1984)The MOS Short-form General Health Survey (1988)Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of Life (2003)Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Scale Development : Theory and Applications (1991)Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation (2005)Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. (1991)Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? (1995)Further Evidence Supporting an SEM-Based Criterion for Identifying Meaningful Intra-Individual Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life (1999)Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life (2003)Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes (2007)Linking Clinical Variables With Health-Related Quality of Life (1995)The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016)A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015)Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches (2002)Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Akufo and Ibarapa (1965)Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires (2006)COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (2017)COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (2018)Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. (1991)Monitoring Depression Treatment Outcomes With the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (2004)The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference (2009)Understanding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures (2019)Incorporating the Patient's Perspective into Drug Development and Communication: An Ad Hoc Task Force Report of the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group Meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001 (2003)OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology (2007)Assessment of Quality-of-Life Outcomes (1996)Being Inconsistent About Consistency: When Coefficient Alpha Does and Doesn't Matter (2003)Methodological index for non‐randomized studies ( MINORS ): development and validation of a new instrument (2003)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1989Measurement of health status5,084 cited
  • 2010The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study4,302 cited
  • 2002Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria2,313 cited
  • 1997The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials2,052 cited
  • 2014Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0788 cited
  • 1998The OMERACT filter for Outcome Measures in Rheumatology.630 cited
  • 1987Clinimetrics538 cited
  • 2002Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research514 cited
  • 2001Looking for important change/differences in studies of responsiveness. OMERACT MCID Working Group. Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. Minimal Clinically Important Difference.235 cited

Cited by

  • 2014How to Choose Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT 11 Approves Filter 2.093 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work