Updating the OMERACT Filter: Discrimination and Feasibility

George A. Wells · Dorcas Beaton · Peter Tugwell · Maarten Boers · John Kirwan · Clifton O. Bingham +19 more

25 citations0/0 files storedThe Journal of Rheumatology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation Health Education and Validation

Abstract

The "Discrimination" part of the OMERACT Filter asks whether a measure discriminates between situations that are of interest. "Feasibility" in the OMERACT Filter encompasses the practical considerations of using an instrument, including its ease of use, time to complete, monetary costs, and interpretability of the question(s) included in the instrument. Both the Discrimination and Reliability parts of the filter have been helpful but were agreed on primarily by consensus of OMERACT participants rather than through explicit evidence-based guidelines. In Filter 2.0 we wanted to improve this definition and provide specific guidance and advice to participants.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 25 citations exist upstream.

References

1989Measurement of health status 2010The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study 2002Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria 1997The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 2014Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0 1998The OMERACT filter for Outcome Measures in Rheumatology.1987Clinimetrics 2002Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research

Cited by

2014Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0 2014How to Choose Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT 11 Approves Filter 2.0

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.