Author affiliation in supply chain management and logistics journals: 2008‐2010

Michael J. Maloni · Craig R. Carter · Lutz Kaufmann

27 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Academic Writing and Publishing Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to extend a series of studies dating back to 1967 that evaluates faculty publication productivity in refereed supply chain management and logistics journals. Design/methodology/approach – Publication output and rankings of academic institutions are based on publication data from six supply chain management and logistics journals from 2008 through 2010. The results are compared to prior studies to identify trends and changes in the rankings. The authors also assess author collaboration influences as well as authorship diversity. Finally, the authors examine further changes to the core set of journals considered for future iterations of this study. Findings – The results indicate that supply chain management and logistics authorship continues to be dynamic. Several schools entered the top 25 ranking for the first time and others substantially improved their rankings. While higher-ranked schools engage in more collaboration within their own institutions, they practice less external and international collaboration. Additionally, the diversity of both individual authors and schools continues to expand, though evidence also suggests some level of emerging stability in sources of authorship. Research limitations/implications – As limitations, the selected journal set may present bias against some authors and institutions, particularly those from outside North America and those choosing to publish in other journals in the field or in related fields. Originality/value – This research stream enables authors and universities to judge their relative productivity of academic scholarship in the supply chain management and logistics field. Moreover, the longitudinal analysis provides insight into the evolving maturity of the field itself.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 27 citations exist upstream.

References

2005Review of supply chain management and logistics research 2002Who Talks to Whom? Intra- and Interdisciplinary Communication of Economics Journals 2011REFRAMING SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT: A SERVICE-DOMINANT LOGIC PERSPECTIVE 1985Using Citation Analysis to Assess the Impact of Journals and Articles on Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR)2011STUDYING SUPPLY CHAINS FROM A SOCIAL NETWORK PERSPECTIVE 2003Thirty‐Rve Years of The Journal of Supply Chain Management: Where Have We Been and Where are We Going?2011RELEVANCE OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT THEORY AND RESEARCH FOR SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT 1996The relative importance of journals used in operations management research A citation analysis

Cited by

2021Lean thinking in lean times for education 2013On the measurement and benchmarking of research impact among active logistics scholars 2020A bibliometric overview of how critical success factors influence on enterprise resource planning implementations 2021Quo vadis OSCM? An analysis of past and future trends in operations and supply chain management research 2015

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.