Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Applying the Risk of Bias Tool in a Systematic Review of Combination Long-Acting Beta-Agonists and Inhaled Corticosteroids for Persistent Asthma

12 references·16 citing·35 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
2007Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review827 cited
2007Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials470 cited
1999Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.368 cited
2009Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study348 cited
2008Bias, Spin, and Misreporting: Time for Full Access to Trial Protocols and Results144 cited
2007Clinical Trial Registration135 cited

Cited by

2017How to avoid bias in systematic reviews of observational studies78 cited
2015Machine learning to assist risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

65 cited

2012Out of sight but not out of mind: how to search for unpublished clinical trial evidence62 cited

2013Inconsistency in the items included in tools used in general health research and physical therapy to evaluate the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials: a descriptive analysis60 cited

2013Can trial quality be reliably assessed from published reports of cancer trials: evaluation of risk of bias assessments in systematic reviews48 cited

2014A meta‐epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials46 cited

2017Randomized clinical trials in dentistry: Risks of bias, risks of random errors, reporting quality, and methodologic quality over the years 1955–201343 cited

2019Disagreements in risk of bias assessment for randomised controlled trials included in more than one Cochrane systematic reviews: a research on research study using cross-sectional design39 cited

2013Practicalities of using a modified version of the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool for randomised and non‐randomised study designs applied in a health technology assessment setting38 cited

2017Inter-rater reliability of AMSTAR is dependent on the pair of reviewers38 cited

2018Machine learning techniques for the automation of literature reviews and systematic reviews in EFSA36 cited

2020Comparing machine and human reviewers to evaluate the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials30 cited

2011Risk of Bias Tool in Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses of Acupuncture in Chinese Journals20 cited

2022Extension of the Composite Quality Score (CQS) as an appraisal tool for prospective, controlled clinical therapy trials–A systematic review of meta-epidemiological evidence18 cited

2023SeroTracker‐RoB : A decision rule‐based algorithm for reproducible risk of bias assessment of seroprevalence studies17 cited

2016Evaluation of risk of bias assessment of trials in systematic reviews of oral health interventions, 1991-201414 cited