‘Little coherence, considerable strain for reader’: A comparison between two rating scales for the assessment of coherenceUte Knoch2007-01-01articleAssessing Writing94 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningPsychometric Methodologies and TestingDiscourse Analysis in Language StudiesAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 94 citations exist upstream.References2003Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences2004Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences1982Rating scale analysis1981Testing Esl Composition: A Practical Approach1993Metadiscourse in Persuasive Writing1991Patterns of Lexis In Text1990Second Language Writing. Research Insights for the Classroom.2014Testing Second Language SpeakingCited by2015Building a better rubric: Mixed methods rubric revision2022The effects of AWE and peer feedback on cohesion and coherence in continuation writing2022Measurement of functional adequacy in different learning contexts2015Development of a Rubric to Assess Academic Writing Incorporating Plagiarism Detectors2016Discourse Topics2020Research Coherence: A Framework for Successful Student Research