SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
THE “LINKED EVIDENCE APPROACH” TO ASSESS MEDICAL TESTS: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS
5 references·0 citing·24 second hop
THE “LINKED EVIDENCE APPROACH” TO ASSESS MEDICAL TESTS: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS (2013)THE “LINKED EVIDENCE APPROACH” TO ASSESS …Assessing Personalized Medicines in Australia (2012)Assessing Personalized Medici…Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews (2011)Using logic models to capture…A capture-recapture analysis demonstrated that randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of diagnostic tests on patient outcomes are rare (2011)A capture-recapture analysis …Using the Principles of Randomized Controlled Trial Design to Guide Test Evaluation (2009)Using the Principles of Rando…Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways (2006)Comparative accuracy: assessi…The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (1983)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Assessing the value of diagnostic tests: a framework for designing and evaluating trials (2012)GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy (2020)QUADAS-C: A Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Diagnostic tests often fail to lead to changes in patient outcomes (2014)Research waste in diagnostic trials: a methods review evaluating the reporting of test-treatment interventions (2017)Test-treatment RCTs are susceptible to bias: a review of the methodological quality of randomized trials that evaluate diagnostic tests (2017)Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. (2001)Crime, fear of crime, environment, and mental health and wellbeing: Mapping review of theories and causal pathways (2012)Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration (2015)Understanding the impacts of mobile phone distraction on driving performance: A systematic review (2016)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Extending an evidence hierarchy to include topics other than treatment: revising the Australian 'levels of evidence' (2009)Personalized medicine: Factors influencing reimbursement (2009)Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews (2012)Randomised comparisons of medical tests: sometimes invalid, not always efficient (2000)When Is Measuring Sensitivity and Specificity Sufficient To Evaluate a Diagnostic Test, and When Do We Need Randomized Trials? (2006)Decision-Analytic Modeling to Evaluate Benefits and Harms of Medical Tests: Uses and Limitations (2009)Proposals for a Phased Evaluation of Medical Tests (2009)Chapter 2: Medical Tests Guidance (2) Developing the Topic and Structuring Systematic Reviews of Medical Tests: Utility of PICOTS, Analytic Frameworks, Decision Trees, and Other Frameworks (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways459 cited
  • 2011Using logic models to capture complexity in systematic reviews372 cited
  • 2009Using the Principles of Randomized Controlled Trial Design to Guide Test Evaluation86 cited
  • 2011A capture-recapture analysis demonstrated that randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of diagnostic tests on patient outcomes are rare73 cited
  • 2012Assessing Personalized Medicines in Australia59 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work