SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trial Descriptors and Use of Structured Abstracts
5 references·16 citing·41 second hop
Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trial Descriptors and Use of Structured Abstracts (1998)Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trial De…Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials:Current Issues and Future Directions (1996)Assessing the Quality of Rand…Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association. (1994)Quality of nonstructured and …Presentation Deficiencies in structured medical abstracts (1993)Presentation Deficiencies in …More Informative Abstracts Revisited (1990)More Informative Abstracts Re…Reporting on Methods in Clinical Trials (1982)Reporting on Methods in Clini…Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials of Periodontal Diseases in Journal Abstracts—A Cross-sectional Survey and Bibliometric Analysis (2017)Reporting Quality of Randomiz…The reporting quality of parallel randomised controlled trials in ophthalmic surgery in 2011: a systematic review (2014)The reporting quality of para…Reporting Quality for Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials in Cancer Nursing Research (2014)Reporting Quality for Abstrac…Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture (1997–2007): An Assessment of Reporting Quality with a CONSORT‐ and STRICTA‐Based Instrument (2010)Randomized Controlled Trials …Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Surgery: A 20-Year Review of Reporting Standards, Methodologic Quality, and Impact (2008)Randomized Controlled Trials …CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration (2008)CONSORT for reporting randomi…Quality of Reporting of Key Methodological Items of Randomized Controlled Trials in Clinical Ophthalmic Journals (2007)Quality of Reporting of Key M…Better reporting of randomized trials in biomedical journal and conference abstracts (2007)Better reporting of randomize…Randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery: Survey of output and quality of reporting (2006)Randomised clinical trials in…How Evidence-Based Are Publications in Clinical Ophthalmic Journals? (2006)How Evidence-Based Are Public…Effects of Technical Editing in Biomedical Journals (2002)Effects of Technical Editing …The quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials published in Ophthalmology (2001)The quality of reporting of r…Reporting and concordance of methodologic criteria between abstracts and articles in diagnostic test studies (2000)Reporting and concordance of …Clarifying the abstracts of systematic literature reviews. (2000)Clarifying the abstracts of s…Peer Review: Studying the Major Otolaryngology Journals (1999)Peer Review: Studying the Maj…Beyond CONSORT: Need for Improved Reporting Standards for Clinical Trials (1998)Beyond CONSORT: Need for Impr…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Analysis of the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in Acute and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, and Myelodysplastic Syndromes as Governed by the CONSORT Statement (2009)Fragility of Results in Ophthalmology Randomized Controlled Trials (2017)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension checklist for reporting within person randomised trials (2019)A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature. (1987)A systematic review of titles and abstracts of experimental studies in medical education: many informative elements missing (2007)Publication Rate of Abstracts Presented at the Shoulder and Elbow Session of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery (2008)Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals (2010)Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT Statement (1996)Quality of Reporting of Randomized, Controlled Trials in Cerebral Palsy (2006)A systematic review of trends in the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials in various research fields (2008)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Electronic Trial Banks: A Complementary Method for Reporting Randomized Trials (2000)APPLICATION OF THE CONSOLIDATED STANDARDS OF REPORTING TRIALS (CONSORT) IN THE FRACTURE CARE LITERATURE (2002)Small evidence for small incisions: pediatric laparoscopy and the need for more rigorous evaluation of novel surgical therapies (2003)Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires (1987)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Interrater Reliability of the Modified Jadad Quality Scale for Systematic Reviews of Alzheimer’s Disease Drug Trials (2001)Examining the Value and Quality of Health Economic Analyses: Implications of Utilizing the QHES (2003)Effects of dance movement therapy and dance on health-related psychological outcomes: A meta-analysis (2013)Accuracy of Data in Abstracts of Published Research Articles (1999)Length and readability of structured software engineering abstracts (2008)Reporting Quality of Systematic Review Abstracts Published in Leading Neurosurgical Journals: A Research on Research Study (2018)Reporting quality of systematic review abstracts in operative dentistry: An assessment using the PRISMA for Abstracts guidelines (2020)Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. (1986)Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study (1997)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)CONSORT 2010: Aktualisierte Leitlinie für Berichte randomisierter Studien im Parallelgruppen-Design (2011)Can trial quality be reliably assessed from published reports of cancer trials: evaluation of risk of bias assessments in systematic reviews (2013)Impact of Low Back Pain Clinical Trials Measured by the Altmetric Score: Cross-Sectional Study (2018)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals (1994)Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals (2005)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1990More Informative Abstracts Revisited524 cited
  • 1982Reporting on Methods in Clinical Trials509 cited
  • 1996Assessing the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials:Current Issues and Future Directions436 cited
  • 1994Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association.203 cited
  • 1993Presentation Deficiencies in structured medical abstracts97 cited

Cited by

  • 1998Beyond CONSORT: Need for Improved Reporting Standards for Clinical Trials64 cited
  • 2007Quality of Reporting of Key Methodological Items of Randomized Controlled Trials in Clinical Ophthalmic Journals61 cited
  • 2008CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration53 cited
  • 2001The quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials published in Ophthalmology52 cited
  • 2000Clarifying the abstracts of systematic literature reviews.49 cited
  • 2002Effects of Technical Editing in Biomedical Journals47 cited
  • 2010Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture (1997–2007): An Assessment of Reporting Quality with a CONSORT‐ and STRICTA‐Based Instrument46 cited
  • 2006Randomised clinical trials in plastic surgery: Survey of output and quality of reporting46 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2008Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Surgery: A 20-Year Review of Reporting Standards, Methodologic Quality, and Impact43 cited
  • 2007Better reporting of randomized trials in biomedical journal and conference abstracts38 cited
  • 2014The reporting quality of parallel randomised controlled trials in ophthalmic surgery in 2011: a systematic review37 cited
  • 2006How Evidence-Based Are Publications in Clinical Ophthalmic Journals?35 cited
  • 2017Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials of Periodontal Diseases in Journal Abstracts—A Cross-sectional Survey and Bibliometric Analysis30 cited
  • 2014Reporting Quality for Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials in Cancer Nursing Research25 cited
  • 1999Peer Review: Studying the Major Otolaryngology Journals23 cited
  • 2000Reporting and concordance of methodologic criteria between abstracts and articles in diagnostic test studies23 cited