The Transparency of Meaning of Sign Language Gestures

Harry W. Hoemann

89 citations0/0 files storedSign language studies

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Hearing Impairment and Communication Hand Gesture Recognition Systems Language and cultural evolution

Abstract

Breger (1970) has presented evidence that the meaning of 30 signs from the American Sign Language lexicon is transparent to persons with no prior experience with the language. In a 30-item multiple choice test administered live by a deaf person, 31 of Breger's 35 Ss made correct responses in more than half the trials, and all but four of the items were correctly identified at better than chance levels. These results might have both theoretical and practical implications, if confirmed. On a theoretical level, Breger's findings suggest that the trend from iconic to formal signs described by Tervoort (1961) has not proceeded very far from the signs' original motivations. They suggest, further, that historical trends in the formation of signs described by Bellugi and Klima (in press) have left the imitative, ideographic component of the signs fairly well intact. Breger's results have practical significance, since the opinion has sometimes been expressed that the ideographic lexicon of American Sign Language makes it an inferior language (Myklebust, 1964). This opinion may have to be revised, since there is evidence from translations into and out of Sign Language that Sign is able to preserve all of the meanings and nuances of an original text in English (Hoemann & Tweney 1973, Tweney & Hoemann 1973). On the other hand, if the meaning of signs is relatively transparent even to persons unfamiliar with the language, Myklebust's reservations may need to be taken seriously. Breger's results, however, must be viewed with considerable caution, since the difficulty level of a multiple choice test is affected by the test composer's selection of incorrect alternatives for each item. From the one example presented in Breger's paper and from the most frequent errors reported, it appears that almost all of the incorrect alternatives for each item appeared elsewhere in the test as response choices for other stimulus

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 89 citations exist upstream.

References

1950Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. By George Kingsley Zipf. Pp. xi, 573. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Press, 1949.1949Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology.1965A dictionary of American sign language on linguistic principles

Cited by

1992Advances in cognition, education, and deafness 1991The role of iconicity in sign language learning by hearing adults 2019The perceived mapping between form and meaning in American Sign Language depends on linguistic knowledge and task: evidence from iconicity and transparency judgments 1981Manual Sign Translucency and Referential Concreteness in the Learning of Signs 2002Cognition, Education, and Deafness: Directions for Research and Instruction 2008The Role of Iconicity in International Sign

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.