Peer assessment: judging the quality of students’ work by comments rather than marks

Phil Davies

94 citations0/0 files storedInnovations in Education and Teaching International

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Student Assessment and Feedback Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods Evaluation of Teaching Practices

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a study into the quality of peer feedback provided by students within a computerised peer‐assessment environment. The study looks at the creation of a ‘feedback index’ that represents the quality of an essay based upon the feedback provided during a peer‐marking process and identifies a significant positive correlation between this index and the average marks produced for an essay. The data produced are analysed in an attempt to ascertain whether specific groups of students, based upon their ability in developing an essay within this subject area, in general tend to mark and/or comment on their peers either too generously or too critically.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 94 citations exist upstream.

References

1998Assessment and Classroom Learning 1999Peer Learning and Assessment 2002The Conscientious Consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning 2001Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The students' views 1995Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment 1994Peer, self and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities 2002Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Classes Using an Action Research Process 2001Web‐based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking‐styles

Cited by

2011Assessing collaboration in a wiki: The reliability of university students' peer assessment 2013Peer assessment in an EFL context: attitudes and friendship bias 2014A comparison of peer and tutor feedback 2016Fostering pre-service teachers' self-regulated learning through self- and peer assessment of wiki projects 2009An educational research course facilitated by online peer assessment 2019

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.