SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reproducibility of the Portuguese version of the PEDro Scale
5 references·3 citing·31 second hop
Reproducibility of the Portuguese version of the PEDro Scale (2011)Reproducibility of the Portuguese version…CENTRAL, PEDro, PubMed, and EMBASE Are the Most Comprehensive Databases Indexing Randomized Controlled Trials of Physical Therapy Interventions (2010)CENTRAL, PEDro, PubMed, and E…Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires (2006)Quality criteria were propose…Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials (2003)Reliability of the PEDro Scal…Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures (2000)Guidelines for the Process of…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…The psychometric properties of the Italian version of the PEDro Scale (2022)The psychometric properties o…Reliability of the PEDro scale: comparison between trials published in predatory and non-predatory journals (2022)Reliability of the PEDro scal…The Quality and Reporting of Randomized Trials in Cardiothoracic Physical Therapy Could Be Substantially Improved (2013)The Quality and Reporting of …Publication bias in clinical research (1991)meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies (1998)The Cochrane Library (2005)INVITED COMMENTARY: Rating the Quality of Trials in Systematic Reviews of Physical Therapy Interventions (2010)Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews – are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders? (2016)Using Embase as a supplement to PubMed in Cochrane reviews differed across fields (2021)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study (2009)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Structural Equations with Latent Variables (1989)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study (2018)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha: Table 1 (1997)A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research (2016)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation (2005)Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross‐cultural health care research: a clear and user‐friendly guideline (2010)STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 2000Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures14,511 cited
  • 2006Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires10,756 cited
  • 2003Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials4,799 cited
  • 2010CENTRAL, PEDro, PubMed, and EMBASE Are the Most Comprehensive Databases Indexing Randomized Controlled Trials of Physical Therapy Interventions108 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Reliability of the PEDro scale: comparison between trials published in predatory and non-predatory journals35 cited
  • 2013The Quality and Reporting of Randomized Trials in Cardiothoracic Physical Therapy Could Be Substantially Improved23 cited
  • 2022The psychometric properties of the Italian version of the PEDro Scale15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work