Articlediamond2011

Reproducibility of the Portuguese version of the PEDro Scale

Sílvia Regina Shiwa · Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa · Anne M. Moseley · Luiz Hespanhol · Roberta Ceila Venancio · Cintia Regina Ruggero +2 more

68 citations0/0 files storedCadernos de Saúde Pública

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Reliability and Agreement in Measurement Delphi Technique in Research

Abstract

The objective of this study was to test the inter-rater reproducibility of the Portuguese version of the PEDro Scale. Seven physiotherapists rated the methodological quality of 50 reports of randomized controlled trials written in Portuguese indexed on the PEDro database. Each report was also rated using the English version of the PEDro Scale. Reproducibility was evaluated by comparing two separate ratings of reports written in Portuguese and comparing the Portuguese PEDro score with the English version of the scale. Kappa coefficients ranged from 0.53 to 1.00 for individual item and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.82 for the total PEDro score was observed. The standard error of the measurement of the scale was 0.58. The Portuguese version of the scale was comparable with the English version, with an ICC of 0.78. The inter-rater reproducibility of the Brazilian Portuguese PEDro Scale is adequate and similar to the original English version.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 68 citations exist upstream.

References

1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data 2000Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures 2006Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires 2003Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials 2010CENTRAL, PEDro, PubMed, and EMBASE Are the Most Comprehensive Databases Indexing Randomized Controlled Trials of Physical Therapy Interventions

Cited by

2022Reliability of the PEDro scale: comparison between trials published in predatory and non-predatory journals 2013The Quality and Reporting of Randomized Trials in Cardiothoracic Physical Therapy Could Be Substantially Improved 2022The psychometric properties of the Italian version of the PEDro Scale

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.