SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How to spot fake open access journals
0 references·5 citing·22 second hop
How to spot fake open access journals (2014)How to spot fake open access journalsAuthors beware! Publishing in predatory journals is harmful (2020)Authors beware! Publishing in…How can a questionable journal be identified: Frameworks and checklists (2019)How can a questionable journa…Predatory Journals: A Threat to Scholarly Publishing (2018)Predatory Journals: A Threat …Scholarly publishing landscapes: a geographical perspective (2016)Scholarly publishing landscap…The library's role in the management and funding of open access publishing (2014)The library's role in the man…How research funders can finance APCs in full OA and hybrid journals (2014)Open-access website gets tough (2014)Academic Libraries and the Economics of Scholarly Publishing in the Twenty-First Century: Portfolio Theory, Product Differentiation, Economic Rent, Perfect Price Discrimination, and the Cost of Prestige (2015)How do self-archiving and Author-pays models associate and contribute to OA citation advantage within hybrid journals (2019)Gutenberg in Shanghai: Chinese Print Capitalism, 1876-1937 (2007)Global geographies of higher education: The perspective of world university rankings (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Health Measurement Scales (2014)Journals in Beall's list perform as a group less well than other open access journals indexed in Scopus but reveal large differences among publishers (2021)Progressive and degenerative journals: on the growth and appraisal of knowledge in scholarly publishing (2022)The motivations and criteria behind China's list of questionable journals (2022)Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing (2013)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)Predatory publishing: A threat to the credibility of science (2020)Excellence or quality? Impact of the current competition regime on science and scientific publishing in Latin America and its implications for development (2013)Negative Effects of “Predatory” Journals on Global Health Research (2018)Readers beware! Predatory journals are infiltrating citation databases (2019)Predatory journals as threats to the academic publishing: a review (2021)“Researchers’ perceptions and awareness of predatory publishing: A survey” (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2019How can a questionable journal be identified: Frameworks and checklists20 cited
  • 2014The library's role in the management and funding of open access publishing18 cited
  • 2020Authors beware! Publishing in predatory journals is harmful15 cited
  • 2016Scholarly publishing landscapes: a geographical perspective14 cited
  • 2018Predatory Journals: A Threat to Scholarly Publishing13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work