Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Is there a solution to publication bias? Researchers call for changes in dissemination of clinical research results

13 references·16 citing·45 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2007Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method9,606 cited
2007Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method3,220 cited
2014Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis1,597 cited
2013Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review1,126 cited
2010Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases1,039 cited
1987Publication bias and clinical trials715 cited
2003Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative?475 cited
2004Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors408 cited
2012How the Scientific Community Reacts to Newly Submitted Preprints: Article Downloads, Twitter Mentions, and Citations294 cited
1998Unpublished Research From a Medical Specialty Meeting262 cited
2011Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists220 cited
2013"Hardly worth the effort"? Medical journals' policies and their editors' and publishers' views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study139 cited
2009An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist64 cited

Cited by

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2017The Weak Spots in Contemporary Science (and How to Fix Them)53 cited

2016Do emergency medicine journals promote trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines? A survey of “Instructions for Authors”51 cited

2016Extent, Awareness and Perception of Dissemination Bias in Qualitative Research: An Explorative Survey46 cited

2019Ethics in Scientific Research: An Examination of Ethical Principles and Emerging Topics45 cited

2019Is positive publication bias really a bias, or an intentionally created discrimination toward negative results?43 cited

2017Further exploration of dissemination bias in qualitative research required to facilitate assessment within qualitative evidence syntheses41 cited

2016Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensus37 cited

2015Hijacked journals are attacking the reliability and validity of medical research.32 cited

2016Thirty percent of abstracts presented at dental conferences are published in full: a systematic review25 cited

2017Quality of development and reporting of dietetic intervention studies in primary care: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials23 cited

2018Why We Need a Formal Systematic Approach to Validating Psychological Tests: The Case of the Rorschach Comprehensive System20 cited

2017Requirements for trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines in critical care journals20 cited

2018Reporting bias in imaging: higher accuracy is linked to faster publication19 cited

2021Open science, COVID-19, and the news: Exploring controversies in the circulation of early SARS-CoV-2 genomic epidemiology research18 cited

2018Publication of Randomized Clinical Trials in Pediatric Research18 cited

2014SALVAGING PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH: A MANIFESTO17 cited