Article2011

The problematic social dimension of sustainable development: the case of the Forest Stewardship Council

79 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Global trade, sustainability, and social impact Forest Management and Policy Sustainable Development and Environmental Management

Abstract

There is broad support worldwide for the concept of sustainable development and the integration of its three pillars: economic development, environmental protection and social development. Nevertheless, previous research shows substantial difficulties associated with fully incorporating and operationalising social sustainability features in various sectors. The present article aims to explore further the reasons why incorporation of social sustainability aspects appears to pose a challenge. The article has a twofold explorative aim. First, the aim is to identify opportunities/benefits or difficulties/detriments that emerge when actors try to incorporate social aspects into sustainability projects. Second, the article probes for explanations for the observed challenges. This is done by referring to a case study examining how the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) has attempted to incorporate social sustainability goals, principles and criteria. Using qualitative interviews, FSC-related documents, participant observation, as well as previous research, the article examines the successes and challenges associated with including social sustainability features in the standards and certification process. Observed achievements and difficulties are highlighted in relation to four general aspects: (1) improvement of substantive social sustainability goals; (2) local organisation, empowerment and employment; (3) communication; and (4) small-scale and community-based forestry. The article suggests and analyses eight reasons for these challenges, which relate to discursive, structural or organisational aspects. The findings presented here may also be useful in attempts to understand other similar integrative transnational and/or local sustainability projects.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 79 citations exist upstream.

References

2007Case study research: principles and practices 2003Reframing Public Policy 2003Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices 2004‘Just sustainability’: the emerging discourse of environmental justice in Britain?2004In the Market But Not of It: Fair Trade Coffee and Forest Stewardship Council Certification as Market-Based Social Change 2008Understanding the Social Dimension of Sustainability 2008Social movements for global democracy 1999Fairness and Futurity

Cited by

2013Global multi-stakeholder standard setters: how fragile are they?2022Trade-offs between economic, environmental and social sustainability on farms using a latent class frontier efficiency model: Evidence for Spanish crop farms 2013Corporate social responsibility and sustainability: insights from Boulding and Luhmann 2018Valuing social sustainability in agriculture: An approach based on social outputs' shadow prices 2014When Transnational Standards Hit the Ground: Domestic Regulations, Compliance Assessment and Forest Certification in Russia

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.