SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A comparison of retained and appointed counsel in cases of capital murder.
6 references·0 citing·27 second hop
A comparison of retained and appointed counsel in cases of capital murder. (1997)A comparison of retained and appointed co…The Capital Jury Project: Rationale, Design, and Preview of Early Findings (1995)The Capital Jury Project: Rat…Discretion in Capital Sentencing Instructions: Guided or Misguided? (1995)Discretion in Capital Sentenc…Life or death decisions: An analysis of capital jury decision making under the special issues sentencing framework. (1994)Life or death decisions: An a…Counsel for the Poor: The Death Sentence Not for the Worst Crime but for the Worst Lawyer (1994)Counsel for the Poor: The Dea…Comprehending life and death matters: A preliminary study of California's capital penalty instructions. (1994)Comprehending life and death …Comprehension of judges' instructions in the penalty phase of a capital trial: Focus on mitigating circumstances. (1992)Comprehension of judges' inst…Personality, cognition, and social interaction (1982)A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. (1983)Commonsense justice and jury instructions: Instructive and reciprocating connections. (2000)Effects of psychopathy and violence risk testimony on mock juror perceptions of dangerousness in a capital murder trial (2004)The impact of mental health evidence on support for capital punishment: are defendants labeled psychopathic considered more deserving of death? (2005)Personality, Cognition and Social Interaction (2017)The Focused Interview (1946)Review of personality and social psychology (1980)Research Methods in Social Relations (1992)Hardening of the Attitudes: Americans' Views on the Death Penalty (1994)Racial Attitudes and the Death Penalty1 (1997)The effects of defendant race, victim race, and juror gender on evidence processing in a murder trial (2006)Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury Instructions (1979)The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion (1986)The heuristic model of persuasion. (1987)Capital jury deliberation: Effects on death sentencing, comprehension, and discrimination. (2009)Discourse in the us Courtroom (2012)Linguistic Human Rights (2012)Life under Wainwright v. Witt: Juror dispositions and death qualification. (1996)Capital jury decision-making: The limitations of predictions of future violence. (2009)Explaining the “Female Victim Effect” in Capital Punishment (2014)Race and jurors' receptivity to mitigation in capital cases: The effect of jurors', defendants', and victims' race in combination. (2004)Showing Remorse: Reflections on the Gap between Expression and Attribution in Cases of Wrongful Conviction (2004)Prevalence and severity of trauma- and stressor-related symptoms among jurors: A review (2016)Predictors of miscarriages of justice in capital cases (2001)In the Shadow of Death (2007)Frontloading Mitigation: The “Legal” and the “Human” in Death Penalty Defense (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1994Counsel for the Poor: The Death Sentence Not for the Worst Crime but for the Worst Lawyer114 cited
  • 1994Comprehending life and death matters: A preliminary study of California's capital penalty instructions.95 cited
  • 1995The Capital Jury Project: Rationale, Design, and Preview of Early Findings72 cited
  • 1994Life or death decisions: An analysis of capital jury decision making under the special issues sentencing framework.65 cited
  • 1992Comprehension of judges' instructions in the penalty phase of a capital trial: Focus on mitigating circumstances.54 cited
  • 1995Discretion in Capital Sentencing Instructions: Guided or Misguided?35 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work