SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Uptake of systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on individual participant data in clinical practice guidelines: descriptive study
11 references·9 citing·43 second hop
Uptake of systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on individual participant data in clinical practice guidelines: descriptive study (2015)Uptake of systematic reviews and meta-ana…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Systematic Review of the Empi…Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey (2012)Assessment of publication bia…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)The impact of outcome reporti…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…H.R. Rothstein, A.J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.) (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. NewYork: Wiley, xvii+356 p. US$100.00. ISBN: 0-470-87014-1. (2007)H.R. Rothstein, A.J. Sutton, …Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Publication Bias in Meta‐Anal…Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis (2004)Investigating patient exclusi…To IPD or not to IPD? (2002)To IPD or not to IPD?Practical methodology of meta‐analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data (1995)Practical methodology of meta…Development of a checklist of standard items for processing individual participant data from randomised trials for meta-analyses: Protocol for a modified e-Delphi study (2022)Development of a checklist of…The methodological quality of individual participant data meta-analysis on intervention effects: systematic review (2021)The methodological quality of…Individual participant data (2019)Individual participant dataTobacco smoking and gastric cancer: meta-analyses of published data versus pooled analyses of individual participant data (StoP Project) (2018)Tobacco smoking and gastric c…How often can meta-analyses of individual-level data individualize treatment? A meta-epidemiologic study (2018)How often can meta-analyses o…Best practices for MRI systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (2018)Best practices for MRI system…Multiple Score Comparison: a network meta-analysis approach to comparison and external validation of prognostic scores (2017)Multiple Score Comparison: a …Association Between Chronic Physical Conditions and the Effectiveness of Collaborative Care for Depression (2016)Association Between Chronic P…A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data (2016)A scoping review of indirect …Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis (2014)Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (2015)Response rates of online surveys in published research: A meta-analysis (2022)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology (2015)Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: Guidance on Their Use (2015)Definitions, Foundations and Associations of Physical Literacy: A Systematic Review (2016)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints (1998)Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice (2005)Recent developments in meta‐analysis (2007)Narrowing the transmission gap: A synthesis of three decades of research on intergenerational transmission of attachment. (2015)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regression (2009)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 3 (2013)Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. (2019)Overweight, Obesity, and Depression (2010)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Travel and the Built Environment (2010)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration5,525 cited
  • 2005Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis2,369 cited
  • 2007H.R. Rothstein, A.J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.) (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. NewYork: Wiley, xvii+356 p. US$100.00. ISBN: 0-470-87014-1.1,251 cited
  • 2010The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews1,133 cited
  • 2013Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review1,126 cited
  • 2002To IPD or not to IPD?571 cited
  • 1995Practical methodology of meta‐analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data492 cited
  • 2012Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey403 cited
  • 2004Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis221 cited

Cited by

  • 2016Association Between Chronic Physical Conditions and the Effectiveness of Collaborative Care for Depression94 cited
  • 2016A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

64 cited
  • 2018Tobacco smoking and gastric cancer: meta-analyses of published data versus pooled analyses of individual participant data (StoP Project)50 cited
  • 2021The methodological quality of individual participant data meta-analysis on intervention effects: systematic review38 cited
  • 2019Individual participant data37 cited
  • 2018Best practices for MRI systematic reviews and meta‐analyses36 cited
  • 2018How often can meta-analyses of individual-level data individualize treatment? A meta-epidemiologic study27 cited
  • 2017Multiple Score Comparison: a network meta-analysis approach to comparison and external validation of prognostic scores17 cited
  • 2022Development of a checklist of standard items for processing individual participant data from randomised trials for meta-analyses: Protocol for a modified e-Delphi study13 cited