Evaluating Journal Quality: Is the H-Index a Better Measure Than Impact Factors?

David R. Hodge · Jeffrey R. Lacasse

96 citations0/0 files storedResearch on Social Work Practice

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Publishing and Scholarly Communication Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluates the utility of a new measure—the h-index—that may provide a more valid approach to evaluating journal quality in the social work profession. Method: H-index values are compared with Thomson ISI 5-year impact factors and expert opinion. Results: As hypothesized, the h-index correlates highly with ISI 5-year impact factors; but exhibits closer agreement with expert opinion, particularly with high familiarity disciplinary journals. Conclusions: This evidence of convergent and discriminatory validity suggests that the h-index may have some utility in assessing social work journals. Notable advantages of the h-index include its compatibility with the profession’s applied research culture and its ability to be used with essentially all journals in which social workers publish.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 96 citations exist upstream.

References

2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output 1976The Practice of Social Research.2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research 1996CURRENT RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 2007Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar 2009Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals 2008Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact

Cited by

2020Effects of Circular Economy Policies on the Environment and Sustainable Growth: Worldwide Research 2011Comparing the expert survey and citation impact journal ranking methods: Example from the field of Artificial Intelligence 2021Open Innovation for Sustainability or Not: Literature Reviews of Global Research Trends 2017Does an expert-based evaluation allow us to go beyond the Impact Factor? Experiences from building a ranking of national journals in Poland

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.