Citation map · Study

Analysis of reporting of systematic reviews in physical therapy published in Portuguese

15 references·2 citing·36 second hop

this work references cited by second hop

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration10,345 cited
1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration3,375 cited
2010An international registry of systematic-review protocols513 cited
2000PEDro. A database of randomized trials and systematic reviews in physiotherapy508 cited
2010CENTRAL, PEDro, PubMed, and EMBASE Are the Most Comprehensive Databases Indexing Randomized Controlled Trials of Physical Therapy Interventions108 cited
2000The QUORUM statement102 cited
2009Indexing of randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions: a comparison of AMED, CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, Hooked on Evidence, PEDro, PsycINFO and PubMed83 cited
2011Epidemiology, Quality and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Traditional Chinese Medicine Interventions Published in Chinese Journals56 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

References

Cited by