SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Predicting highly cited papers: A Method for Early Detection of Candidate Breakthroughs · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticlePredicting highly cited papers: A Method for Early Detection of Candidate Breakthroughs

Ilya V. Ponomarev2012

Article2012

Predicting highly cited papers: A Method for Early Detection of Candidate Breakthroughs

Ilya V. Ponomarev · Duane E. Williams · Charles J. Hackett · Joshua D. Schnell · Haak Laurel

68 citations·0/0 files stored·Technological Forecasting and Social Change

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Psychology Research and Bibliometrics Web visibility and informetrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 68 citations exist upstream.

References

1968The Matthew Effect in Science 1973Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents 1968The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.1965Networks of Scientific Papers 1972Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation 1976A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes 2009Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience 2009Towards an explanatory and computational theory of scientific discovery

Cited by

2019Identifying breakthrough scientific papers 2017Growing complex network of citations of scientific papers: Modeling and measurements 2019Do we measure novelty when we analyze unusual combinations of cited references? A validation study of bibliometric novelty indicators based on F1000Prime data 2020Identifying citation patterns of scientific breakthroughs: A perspective of dynamic citation process 2022Combination of research questions and methods: A new measurement of scientific novelty

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2014Breakthrough paper indicator 2.0: can geographical diversity and interdisciplinarity improve the accuracy of outstanding papers prediction?article · 15 shared references 2019Measuring Science: Basic Principles and Application of Advanced Bibliometricschapter · 7 shared references 2015A review of theory and practice in scientometricsarticle · 6 shared references 2018Identifying single influential publications in a research field: new analysis opportunities of the CRExplorerarticle · 6 shared references 2018Science of sciencereview · 5 shared references 2008Bibliometrics to webometricsarticle · 5 shared references

Details

Year2012

Typearticle

Published2012-11-21

VenueTechnological Forecasting and Social Change

ISSN-L0040-1625

Languageen

Citations68

Files0 public / 0

Shelfscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.017

openalex_workW2002646977

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2022Quantifying scientific breakthroughs by a novel disruption indicator based on knowledge entities

2020Predicting scientific breakthroughs based on knowledge structure variations

2017European Paradox or Delusion—Are European Science and Economy Outdated?