Suit and Settlement vs. Trial: A Theoretical Analysis under Alternative Methods for the Allocation of Legal Costs

Abstract

Will a party who believes that he has a legally admissible claim for money damages decide to bring suit?if so, will he subsequently settle with the opposing party or will he go ahead to trial?These questions are analyzed under four methods for allocating legal costs, namely, under the American yem, whereby each side bears its own costs; under the "indemnity" or British yem, whereby the losing side bears all costs; under the ytem favoring the whereby the plaintiff pays only his own costs if he loses and nothing otherwise; and under the ystem favor the defendant, whereby the defendant pays only his own costs if he loses and nothing otherwise.Following the analysis, two brief illustrations are considered and comments are made on the relative social desirability of the methods of allocating legal costs.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 307 citations exist upstream.