SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Descriptive Analysis of Overviews of Reviews Published between 2000 and 2011
8 references·16 citing·42 second hop
A Descriptive Analysis of Overviews of Reviews Published between 2000 and 2011 (2012)A Descriptive Analysis of Overviews of Re…Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions (2011)Methodology in conducting a s…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of …Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Assessing Risk of Bias in Inc…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…Validation of an index of the quality of review articles (1991)Validation of an index of the…Introduction to Umbrella Reviews as a Useful Evidence-Based Practice (2023)Introduction to Umbrella Revi…Methods for depicting overlap in overviews of systematic reviews: An introduction to static tabular and graphical displays (2020)Methods for depicting overlap…Guidance for overviews of reviews continues to accumulate, but important challenges remain: a scoping review (2020)Guidance for overviews of rev…Umbrella reviews: what they are and why we need them (2019)Umbrella reviews: what they a…Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions (2019)Preferred Reporting Items for…Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2—risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence (2018)Toward a comprehensive eviden…Minor differences were found between AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS in the assessment of systematic reviews including both randomized and nonrandomized studies (2018)Minor differences were found …Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 1—purpose, eligibility, search and data extraction (2017)Toward a comprehensive eviden…Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews (2017)Selecting and implementing ov…Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis (2017)Same family, different specie…Risk of bias in overviews of reviews: a scoping review of methodological guidance and four‐item checklist (2017)Risk of bias in overviews of …Overviews of systematic reviews: great promise, greater challenge (2017)Overviews of systematic revie…Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions (2017)Evaluation of AMSTAR to asses…What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary (2016)What guidance is available fo…Overviews in Education Research (2016)Overviews in Education Resear…Systematic review found AMSTAR, but not R(evised)-AMSTAR, to have good measurement properties (2014)Systematic review found AMSTA…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research (2010)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Guidelines for Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic Tests (1994)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions (2011)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview (2014)An overview of systematic reviews on the public health consequences of social isolation and loneliness (2017)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Efficacy of interventions to reduce coercive treatment in mental health services: umbrella review of randomised evidence (2020)Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for mental health outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries: an umbrella review (2020)Sleep duration and health outcomes: an umbrella review (2021)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada (2015)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2008Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies3,791 cited
  • 2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies3,395 cited
  • 2011Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions1,227 cited
  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
  • 1991Validation of an index of the quality of review articles788 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions228 cited
  • 2019Umbrella reviews: what they are and why we need them201 cited
  • 2016What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary195 cited
  • 2017Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 1—purpose, eligibility, search and data extraction184 cited
  • 2014Systematic review found AMSTAR, but not R(evised)-AMSTAR, to have good measurement properties

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

161 cited
  • 2018Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2—risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence139 cited
  • 2023Introduction to Umbrella Reviews as a Useful Evidence-Based Practice139 cited
  • 2017Risk of bias in overviews of reviews: a scoping review of methodological guidance and four‐item checklist136 cited
  • 2017Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews134 cited
  • 2017Overviews of systematic reviews: great promise, greater challenge133 cited
  • 2016Overviews in Education Research132 cited
  • 2017Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis122 cited
  • 2018Minor differences were found between AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS in the assessment of systematic reviews including both randomized and nonrandomized studies118 cited
  • 2020Methods for depicting overlap in overviews of systematic reviews: An introduction to static tabular and graphical displays116 cited
  • 2020Guidance for overviews of reviews continues to accumulate, but important challenges remain: a scoping review115 cited
  • 2017Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions107 cited