Absorptive capacity and network orchestration in innovation communities – promoting service innovation

Satu Nätti · Pia Hurmelinna‐Laukkanen · Wesley James Johnston

59 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Business and Industrial Marketing

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Innovation and Knowledge Management Service and Product Innovation Business Strategy and Innovation

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to increase understanding of service innovation in networks. Especially the most loosely coupled forms of innovation networks, innovation communities, can be valuable in service innovation, but may not be manageable in the traditional sense. Rather, they may require orchestration characterized by discreet guidance that also accommodates the specific nature of services. Through informed orchestration, it is possible to deal with several contingencies, and influence the absorptive capacity at the network level to generate new service innovations. Design/methodology/approach – These issues are examined through literature review and a case study. Findings – The findings suggest that individual orchestration mechanisms may be more closely connected to certain contingencies than others, and that both orchestration mechanisms and contingency factors have a role in absorptive capacity development within service innovation networks. Research limitations/implications – While the case study approach limits the possibility to make wide generalizations, the in-depth insights provide valuable knowledge. Practical implications – There has been a shift from inter-firm competition towards competition between networks of organizations, increasing relevance of absorptive capacity at the network level. Originality/value – Despite the recent increase in service innovation literature, research on service innovation taking place in networks is scant. Knowledge on some aspects can be derived from more traditional notions on technological innovation, but both the distinctive features of services and central characteristics of innovation networks make it necessary to reconsider some of the established views. In particular, managing – or rather orchestrating – service innovation is still a challenging area.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 59 citations exist upstream.

References

1973The Strength of Weak Ties 1990Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation 1996The Art of Case Study Research 2002Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension 1996Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm 2005Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms 2001Value creation in E‐business 1998Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning

Cited by

2016Using external knowledge to improve organizational innovativeness: understanding the knowledge leveraging process 2020The network orchestrator as steward: Strengthening norms as an orchestration practice 2021Network market and entrepreneurial orientations as facilitators of international performance in born globals. The mediating role of ambidextrous dynamic capabilities 2018A framework of interfirm open innovation: relationship and knowledge based perspectives 2017Addressing dual embeddedness: The roles of absorptive capacity and appropriability mechanisms in subsidiary performance

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.