Citation map · Study

Planning by Law and Property Rights Reconsidered

2 references·16 citing·50 second hop

this work references cited by second hop

References

2018Planning, Law and Economics: The Rules We Make for Using Land105 cited
2006Planning, Law and Economics97 cited

Cited by

2022Urbanization, migration, and the challenges of resilience thinking in urban planning: Insights from two contrasting planning systems in Germany and Iran67 cited
2016Citizen activism, conservative views & mega planning in a digital era54 cited
2015Putting Localism in Place: Conservative Images of the Good Community and the Contradictions of Planning Reform in England51 cited
2016‘The dynamics of “post-crisis” spatial planning: A comparative study of office conversion policies in England and The Netherlands38 cited
2022Planning with power. Implementing urban densification policies in Zurich, Switzerland37 cited
2013The post-1994 South African spatial planning system and Bill of Rights: A meaningful and mutually beneficial fit?27 cited
2019Rapid urbanisation to non-metropolitan urban South Africa: A call for Accrediting credible ‘informal’ life-enhancing responses and institutions24 cited
2023The Business of Densification23 cited
2018No Permanent Friends, No Permanent Enemies: Agonistic Ethos, Tactical Coalitions, and Sustainable Infrastructure22 cited
2016Clumsy City by Design—A Theory for Jane Jacobs’ Imperfect Cities?22 cited
2013The future of the suburbs. Suburbs in transition/The resettlement of America's suburbs/Suburbs in global context: the challenges of continued growth and retrofitting/Suburban urbanity: re-envisioning indigenous settlement practices/Toward a new suburban America: will we catch the wave?/Optimistic and pessimistic perspectives on the evolution of the North American suburb/Response

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work