SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Ups and Downs of Peer Review: Making Funding Choices for Science
16 references·1 citing·33 second hop
The Ups and Downs of Peer Review: Making Funding Choices for Science (2000)The Ups and Downs of Peer Review: Making …Science, the Endless Frontier (2020)Science, the Endless FrontierChronicle of Higher Education (1996)Chronicle of Higher EducationThe Second International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication (1994)The Second International Cong…Structural Transformations of the Sciences and the End of Peer Review (1994)Structural Transformations of…Scientists and the Integrity of Research (1994)Scientists and the Integrity …Inappropriate and Appropriate Selection of 'Peers' in Grant Review (1994)Inappropriate and Appropriate…Drawbacks of peer review (1993)Drawbacks of peer reviewPeerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy (1992)Peerless Science: Peer Review…Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy. (1991)Peerless Science: Peer Review…Effect of Acceptance or Rejection on the Author's Evaluation of Peer Review of Medical Manuscripts (1990)Effect of Acceptance or Rejec…Funding Science: The Real Defects of Peer Review and An Alternative To It (1985)Funding Science: The Real Def…Peer review in the National Science Foundation: Phase two of a study (1981)Peer review in the National S…Sociology of Science (1975)Sociology of ScienceSocial Stratification in Science (1974)Social Stratification in Scie…Little Science, Big Science (1963)Little Science, Big ScienceScience: The Endless Frontier (1945)Science: The Endless FrontierDiscouragement of innovation by overcompetitive research funding (2001)Discouragement of innovation …Criteria for scientific choice (1963)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory (2000)Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions (2005)Fairness as Appropriateness (2009)What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences? (2018)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Learning by Expanding (2014)Advancing Scientific Research in Education (2004)Beyond blind faith: overcoming the obstacles to interdisciplinary evaluation (2006)Legitimate judgment in art, the scientific world reversed? Maintaining critical distance in evaluation (2013)The Moderating Effect of Environmental Munificence and Dynamism on the Relationship Between Discretionary Social Responsibility and Firm Performance (2004)Scientific Culture and Educational Research (2005)Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2007)Interpersonal expectancy effects: the first 345 studies (1978)On Making Marketing Science More Scientific: Role of Orientations, Paradigms, Metaphors, and Puzzle Solving (1985)Risk Analysis and Risk Management: An Historical Perspective (1985)A Theory of Group Stability (1991)The Origins of Status Hierarchies: A Formal Theory and Empirical Test (2002)The Academic Caste System: Prestige Hierarchies in PhD Exchange Networks (2004)Peer review of grant applications: what do we know? (1998)Scientific Culture and Educational Research (2002)Governing Science (2016)Emerging Criteria for Quality in Qualitative and Interpretive Research (1995)Implementing Service Learning in Higher Education (1996)Executive Perceptions of the Top 10 Soft Skills Needed in Today’s Workplace (2012)Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway (2012)Innovation policy: what, why, and how (2017)Transformative innovation policy: Addressing variety in an emerging policy paradigm (2018)Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature (2006)Research and Development, Spillovers, Innovation Systems, and the Genesis of Regional Growth in Europe (2008)Actionable Knowledge for Environmental Decision Making: Broadening the Usability of Climate Science (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1963Little Science, Big Science4,272 cited
  • 1996Chronicle of Higher Education3,019 cited
  • 1945Science: The Endless Frontier1,487 cited
  • 1974Social Stratification in Science1,197 cited
  • 2020Science, the Endless Frontier321 cited
  • 1992Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy280 cited
  • 1975Sociology of Science275 cited
  • 1991Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy.189 cited
  • 1985Funding Science: The Real Defects of Peer Review and An Alternative To It140 cited
  • 1981Peer review in the National Science Foundation: Phase two of a study84 cited
  • 1994Structural Transformations of the Sciences and the End of Peer Review64 cited
  • 1994The Second International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication60 cited
  • 1994Scientists and the Integrity of Research60 cited
  • 1994Inappropriate and Appropriate Selection of 'Peers' in Grant Review51 cited
  • 1993Drawbacks of peer review44 cited
  • 1990Effect of Acceptance or Rejection on the Author's Evaluation of Peer Review of Medical Manuscripts

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

31 cited

Cited by

  • 2001Discouragement of innovation by overcompetitive research funding8 cited