An Investigation of the Properties of Kolb's Learning Style Inventory

Abstract

The Experiential Learning Model devised by Kolb proposes that learning is a cyclic process involving four kinds of abilities: that all normal adults possess and use abilities in all four modes; the level of these abilities and preferences for their use varies among individuals; individual learning style can be assessed through the use of the Learning Style Inventory (LSI). These propositions have important implications for human development and those responsible for it. A research programme to generate evidence of work‐based coping behaviour among managers with which to assess the validity of the first three of these propositions is reported. Three versions of the LSI were administered (standard, elaborated and randomised) on a test‐retest basis to a sample of adult participants in courses in management studies at Sunderland Polytechnic, and 130 usable results were obtained. The inventories were administered twice with an intervening period of six weeks during the 1984/85 academic year. Data analysis explored test‐retest stability, internal consistency and factor identification. The apparent test‐retest stability of groups masks considerable variation at the level of the individual. Changing the order of the items in the inventory brings a reduction in test‐related and split‐half correlations. The elaborated version of the inventory produced less reliable results than the standard and randomised versions, and the pattern of item associations was very difficult. Those who wish to use the LSI to classify individuals according to learning style should do so with care.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 48 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.