Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Why the Haves Don't Always Come Out Ahead: Repeat Players Meet Amici CCuriae for the Disadvantaged

15 references·14 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1974Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change2,807 cited
1993Political research quarterly1,578 cited
1954The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science750 cited
1953The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science, by David Easton464 cited
1992On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision Making337 cited
1992Who Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs and Underdogs in the United States Courts of Appeals243 cited
1987Do The “Haves” Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970220 cited
1993The Supreme Court and legal change: abortion and the death penalty219 cited
1992Ideology, Status, and The Differential Success of Direct Parties Before the Supreme Court199 cited
1991The American courts : a critical assessment158 cited
1993Interest Group Success in the Courts: Amicus Participation in the Supreme Court134 cited
1995Courts of Appeals123 cited
1991Debunking the Myth of Interest Group Invincibility in the Courts101 cited
1993Party Capability Theory and Appellate Success in the Supreme Court of Canada, 1949–199290 cited
1991Party Capability Theory as an Explanation for Intervention Behavior in the English Court of Appeal

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

77 cited

Cited by

2013Do the “Haves” Come Out Ahead in Shanghai Courts?139 cited
2012The Solicitor General and the United States Supreme Court: Executive Branch Influence and Judicial Decisions51 cited
2013Examining the Effects of Information, Attorney Capability, and Amicus Participation on U.S. Supreme Court Decision Making38 cited
2013Is Certiorari Contingent on Litigant Behavior? Petitioners' Role in Strategic Auditing31 cited
2007Splitting the Difference: Modeling Appellate Court Decisions with Mixed Outcomes31 cited
2013Haves and Have-Nots before the Law Lords27 cited
2017The Losing Media? An Empirical Study of Defamation Litigation in China26 cited
2020A Court of Specialists26 cited
2011The Small Group Context: Designated District Court Judges in the U.S. Courts of Appeals26 cited
2012A Built-In Advantage22 cited
2012Selecting the Select Few: The Discuss List and the U.S. Supreme Court's Agenda‐Setting Process22 cited
2017Lobbying Justice(s)? Exploring the Nature of Amici Influence in State Supreme Court Decision Making20 cited
2010Friends of the Circuits: Interest Group Influence on Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals17 cited
2014Judges and Friends15 cited