Unlocking Knowledge Transfer Potential: Knowledge Demonstrability and Superordinate Social Identity

Aimée A. Kane

221 citations0/0 files storedOrganization Science

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Knowledge Management and Sharing Innovation and Knowledge Management Team Dynamics and Performance

Abstract

This study presents a conceptual model of when and how knowledge demonstrability and superordinate social identity impact the likelihood that organizations capitalize on their knowledge resources. To test the model, an experimental methodology was used in which a member transfers from one group to another, transmitting knowledge in the form of a production routine. As predicted, work groups unlocked the knowledge transfer potential arising from personnel movement more often when they shared a superordinate identity than when they did not share such an identity, and this identity effect was moderated by knowledge demonstrability. When knowledge was less demonstrable with concealed merits, it was more likely to transfer between groups that shared a superordinate identity, compared to groups that did not share such an identity. By contrast, when knowledge was more demonstrable with apparent merits, it was as likely to transfer between groups that shared a superordinate identity compared to groups that did not share such an identity. As predicted, superordinate identity induced knowledge consideration, the focusing of group attention on determining the value of another's knowledge. Mediated moderation analyses revealed that this process underlies knowledge transfer. Superordinate social identity induced thorough knowledge consideration, which was more important for recognizing the value of knowledge when its merits were concealed rather than apparent. Because the merits of many organizational routines and practices are concealed and superordinate identity appears to be a key to unlocking the knowledge transfer potential of less demonstrable knowledge, this study has important implications for managing knowledge resources.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 221 citations exist upstream.

References

1990Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation 1991Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning 1963Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research 1979The Social psychology of intergroup relations 1998Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know 1989Social Identity Theory and the Organization 1996Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm 1988Organizational Learning

Cited by

2011Dynamics in Groups: Are We There Yet?2012Facilitating Innovation in Diverse Science Teams Through Integrative Capacity 2017Open-System Orchestration as a Relational Source of Sensing Capabilities: Evidence from a Venture Association 2012Social Category Diversity Promotes Premeeting Elaboration: The Role of Relationship Focus 2012Changing Routines: A Process Model of Vicarious Group Learning in Pharmaceutical R&D 2014Finding a Home away from Home

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.