Islamic Doctrinal Orthodoxy and Religious Orientations: Scale Development and Validation

Chang-Ho C. Ji · Yodi Ibrahim

70 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal for the Psychology of Religion

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology Islamic Thought and Society Studies Study and Philosophy of Religion

Abstract

A measure of Islamic doctrinal orthodoxy was developed, and its relation to personal religious activities was examined. This study also applied the concept of extrinsic, intrinsic, and quest religiosity to Islamic faith as it investigated the structural validity and internal consistency of Islamic versions of the religious orientation scales. A sample of 381 students was taken from three universities in Indonesia. Notably, the scales were found to be psychometrically adequate and their doctrinal orthodoxy and intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity scores significantly related to personal practice of religious activities. A subsequent analysis also revealed that, for Muslims, doctrinal beliefs are largely independent of extrinsic, intrinsic, and quest religiosity and that the three forms of religiosity are three autonomous but continuous dimensions of personal religiosity.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 70 citations exist upstream.

References

1970Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research 1967Personal Religious Orientation and Prejudice.1980Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials 1980Cross-Cultural Research Methods 2006Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality 1989Intrinsic/Extrinsic Measurement: I/E-Revised and Single-Item Scales 1985Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Review and meta-analysis.1976Religion as Prosocial: Agent or Double Agent?

Cited by

2021The consumers’ commitment and materialism on Islamic banking: the role of religiosity 2021The awareness and attitude of Muslim consumer preference: the role of religiosity 2018Religiosity and corporate social responsibility practices: evidence from an emerging economy 2010Religiosity, Psychological Acculturation to the Host Culture, Self-Esteem and Depressive Symptoms Among Stigmatized and Nonstigmatized Religious Immigrant Groups in Western Europe 2022Determinants to adopt conventional and Islamic banking: evidence from Indonesia

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.