Psychological Test Interpretation: Integrative or Disintegrate?

Abstract

The need for constructive debate by psychologists about the interpretation of psychological tests is noted. This paper is a critique of Crites' integrative test interpretation approach which eschews a specific test-interpretation session in favour of feeding in such data as are perceived appropriate by the counsellor during subsequent counselling. Five problem areas are noted: hidden knowledge; counsellor as guru; clients' rights and responsibilities; using any information in counselling; and little supportive evidence. It is concluded that the ‘integrative’ approach fails to live up to its laudable intentions. To promote the debate about psychological test interpretation, seven general principles are outlined to further the development of more useful approaches to the use of tests in counselling.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 0 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.