The structure of children's interests and competence perceptions.

Terence J. G. Tracey · Christopher C. Ward

163 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Counseling Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Career Development and Diversity Education, Achievement, and Giftedness Psychological Testing and Assessment

Abstract

Two studies were conducted with samples of elementary school, middle school, and college students, who were given the Inventory of Children's Activities, which was designed to assess J. L. Holland's (1973, 1985a) RIASEC (Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, and Conventional) types on interests and competence perceptions. The structure was examined at the scale and item levels using the randomization test of hypothesized order relations and principal-components analysis. Results indicated that (a) there were few differences in structure between interests and competence perceptions, (b) the structure of interests and competence perceptions varied across age, (c) the fit of the circular model was positively related to age, (d) elementary and middle school students evaluated their interests and competencies using different dimensions than did college students, and (e) there were scale score mean differences across gender and age. The prevailing model used in most interest inventories is the one posited by John Holland (1973, 1985a) of six types (Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, and Conventional, hereafter referred to as RIASEC) arranged in a hexagon (or circle). In a meta-analytic examination of the RIASEC structure across 104 different samples, Tracey and Rounds (1993) found support for the circular structure of interests from the age of 14 through adulthood. Also, they found that the structure held equally across gender and the different instruments used. However, it is unknown if this circular structure of RIASEC interest types is valid for children, because age groups younger than 14 have not been examined. The primary purpose of this study was to ascertain the structure of interests in children. Can the interests of children be represented using the six RIASEC types? If so, does the circular arrangement of these types also accurately represent children's data?

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 163 citations exist upstream.

References

1977Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.1982Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.2002Social Foundations of Thought and Action 1994Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance 1973Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments 1980A life-span, life-space approach to career development 1982The Perceived Competence Scale for Children 1986Career Choice and Development.

Cited by

2003The Circumplex Model: Methods and Research Applications 2012Longitudinal analysis of the relations between opportunities to learn about science and the development of interests related to science 2000Advances in vocational psychology theory and research.1999The incremental validity of vocational self-efficacy: An examination of interest, self-efficacy, and occupation.2003Stability and change in interests: A longitudinal study of adolescents from grades 8 through 12

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.