The Relations among Organizational and Distribution Forms and Capital and Asset Risk Structures in the Life Insurance Industry

Etti G. Baranoff · Thomas W. Sager

92 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Risk & Insurance

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Insurance and Financial Risk Management Banking stability, regulation, efficiency Corporate Finance and Governance

Abstract

Abstract This article is the first step toward integrating in a single framework two previously separate lines of research on major structural decisions of life insurers. The literature has previously studied the relation between capital structure and asset risk on the one hand, and the relation between organizational form and distribution system on the other hand, without integrating them. Using life insurer data for 1993–1999, we model the four key insurer decisions of capital structure, asset risk, organizational form, and distribution system as endogenous choices in a single interrelated set of simultaneous equations. The model assesses the nature of the interactions among these decisions. The model also assesses the impact of insurers' fundamental business strategy (treated as predetermined) on these choices. The business‐strategy hypothesis views other key decisions as jointly determined and driven by the fundamental business strategy, once the latter is set in motion. Confirming previous studies, we find a positive relation between capital ratios and asset risk. We also find an association in the simultaneous context between stock ownership and brokerage distribution, which was not found in prior studies. Stock ownership is related to greater financial and asset risk taking, whereas brokerage distribution is associated with lower risk taking. These and other results are interpreted in light of several theories, including transaction‐cost economics (TCE), agency theory, and regulatory and bankruptcy cost avoidance. Deriving from these theories, the finite risk paradigm emerges as the most comprehensive interpretation of the results, as opposed to the risk‐subsidy hypothesis of the impact of guarantee funds. We also find support for the notion that the business strategy drives the capital and distribution decisions, as predicted by TCE.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 92 citations exist upstream.

References

1937The Nature of the Firm 1976Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications.1983Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics 1979Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations 1986The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration 1976Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems 1978Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process 1988Corporate Finance and Corporate Governance

Cited by

2010The Quality of Insurance Intermediary Services—Empirical Evidence for Germany 2010The Demise of the Mutual Organizational Form: An Investigation of the Life Insurance Industry 2009Regulatory competition and forbearance: Evidence from the life insurance industry 2015IS THE CAPITAL STRUCTURE LOGIC OF CORPORATE FINANCE APPLICABLE TO INSURERS? REVIEW AND ANALYSIS 2011Institutional Ownership Stability and Risk Taking: Evidence from the Life-Health Insurance Industry

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.