Sociodemographic determinants of multiple unhealthy behaviours

Mikko Laaksonen · Ritva Prättälä · Eero T. Lahelma

81 citations0/0 files storedScandinavian Journal of Public Health

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Health disparities and outcomes Health and Lifestyle Studies Public Health and Social Inequalities

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although behaviours regarded as unhealthy are widespread, behaving in an unhealthy manner in several respects is relatively uncommon. However, people with multiple unhealthy behaviours exist and their number is larger than expected if the behaviours were not related to each other. The aim of this study was to examine sociodemographic determinants of multiple unhealthy behaviours, with special reference to independent and combined effects of the determinants. METHODS: Data on unhealthy behaviours were derived from nationwide surveys among Finnish adults. The mean number of unhealthy behaviours practised on a daily basis and the probability of reporting three or four of these behaviours was examined across sociodemographic groups. RESULTS: Age, educational level and marital status predicted reporting of three or four unhealthy behaviours. Interactions were observed between education and age in both genders as well as between marital status and age in men and educational level and living area in women. Mean numbers of unhealthy behaviours showed similar patterns to having three or four unhealthy behaviours but few differences between the means were statistically significant and there were no interactions. CONCLUSION: The influence of each sociodemographic determinant on multiple unhealthy behaviours was relatively independent from the other sociodemographic determinants. As the effect of these determinants tends to be cumulative, engaging in multiple unhealthy behaviours is common in population subgroups with several unfavourable characteristics. In health promotion initiatives special attention should be paid to such population groups and their social circumstances.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 81 citations exist upstream.

References

1992Gender, marital status and the social control of health behavior 2003Health and Lifestyles 1993The Strategy of Preventive Medicine 1992Analysis of the association between marital relationships and health problems: An interactional perspective.1990Mortality Differentials by Marital Status: An International Comparison 1984Health and Ways of Living: The Alameda County Study.1995Health behaviours explain part of the differences in self reported health associated with partner/marital status in The Netherlands.1997Health behaviours and socio-economic status in Ontario, Canada

Cited by

2009Low Life Course Socioeconomic Status (SES) is Associated with Negative NEO PI-R Personality Patterns 2019Contribution of smoking and alcohol consumption to income differences in life expectancy: evidence using Danish, Finnish, Norwegian and Swedish register data 2009Social class differences in health behaviours among employees from Britain, Finland and Japan: The influence of psychosocial factors 2017The contribution of alcohol consumption and smoking to educational inequalities in life expectancy among Swedish men and women during 1991–2008

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.