Cited by

• 2018Perceived strength of forensic scientists’ reporting statements about source conclusions39 cited
• 2018The Uncertain Future of Forensic Science38 cited
• 2021Forensic science and the principle of excluded middle: “Inconclusive” decisions and the structure of error rate studies38 cited
• 2023The scientific reinvention of forensic science35 cited
• 2016Development of European standards for evaluative reporting in forensic science34 cited
• 2015Fingerprint identification: advances since the 2009 National Research Council report34 cited
• 2019The Long Arm of the Algorithm? Automated Facial Recognition as Evidence and Trigger for Police Intervention24 cited
• 2022The strange persistence of (source) “identification” claims in forensic literature through descriptivism, diagnosticism and machinism24 cited
• 2021Implementation of algorithms in pattern & impression evidence: A responsible and practical roadmap22 cited
• 2020Mt. Everest—we are going to lose many: a survey of fingerprint examiners’ attitudes towards probabilistic reporting18 cited
• 2018Normative decision analysis in forensic science14 cited
• 2018A formal approach to qualifying and quantifying the ‘goodness’ of forensic identification decisions13 cited
• 2016A little ignorance is a dangerous thing: engaging with exogenous knowledge not adduced by the parties13 cited
• 2018Decisional Dimensions in Expert Witness Testimony – A Structural Analysis12 cited
• 2017What is the error margin of your signature analysis?11 cited
• 2022Is forensic science in crisis?10 cited