Forer Revisited: Acceptability of a Fake Personality Sketch

Tom J. P. Verberne

1 citations0/0 files storedPsychological Reports

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Personality Traits and Psychology Deception detection and forensic psychology

Abstract

Prior administration of a personality test appears to account for less than one-fifth of the variance involved in the accuracy ratings of a pseudo-personality sketch presented to 53 medical students.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1 citations exist upstream.

References

1949The fallacy of personal validation: a classroom demonstration of gullibility.1948The H-T-P test 1972A further look at student acceptance of general personality interpretations.1963Student Acceptance of Generalized Personality Interpretations 1955The acceptability of "fake" versus "bona fide" personality test interpretations.1968“Personal Validation:” Replication of Forer's Study 1972Personal gullibility or pseudodiagnosis: A further test of the “fallacy of personal validation”1970Acceptance of Generalized versus “Bona Fide” Personality Interpretation

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.