Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences

10 references·16 citing·41 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
2006Theory and practise of the g-index2,347 cited
2006Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?548 cited
2007Lifting the crown—citation z-score274 cited
1968Patterns of Name Ordering Among Authors of Scientific Papers: A Study of Social Symbolism and Its Ambiguity242 cited
2010Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performance190 cited
2010A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments189 cited
2008Mathematical theory of the h‐ and g‐index in case of fractional counting of authorship137 cited
1997Fractional counting of multiauthored publications: Consequences for the impact of authors122 cited
2011Research productivity: Are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones?106 cited

Cited by

2018Fair ranking of researchers and research teams78 cited
2016Applications of Data Envelopment Analysis in Education64 cited
2013Are the authors of highly cited articles also the most productive ones?63 cited
2016Performance-based funding models and researcher behavior: An analysis of the influence of the Norwegian Publication Indicator at the individual level

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

60 cited

2013Career advancement and scientific performance in universities57 cited

2015The VQR , I taly's second national research assessment: Methodological failures and ranking distortions57 cited

2021Counting methods introduced into the bibliometric research literature 1970–2018: A review54 cited

2017The need to quantify authors’ relative intellectual contributions in a multi-author paper51 cited

2016The evolution of research collaboration within and across disciplines in Italian Academia49 cited

2023From ‘publish or perish’ to ‘publish for purpose’46 cited

2014Should the research performance of scientists be distinguished by gender?42 cited

2015Gender bias in academic recruitment42 cited

2015Author credit‐assignment schemas: A comparison and analysis36 cited

2022What Is Wrong With the Current Evaluative Bibliometrics?35 cited

2013Measuring institutional research productivity for the life sciences: the importance of accounting for the order of authors in the byline34 cited

2016The north–south divide in the Italian higher education system33 cited