SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

How good is research really? · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleHow good is research really?

Lutz Bornmann2012

OA

Articlebronze2012

How good is research really?

Lutz Bornmann · Werner Marx

92 citations·0/0 files stored·EMBO Reports

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Psychology Research and Bibliometrics Web visibility and informetrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 92 citations exist upstream.

References

2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output 2004Science and Engineering Indicators 2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor 1980Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities 2007What do we know about the h index?2011Scientific peer review 1986Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact 2012The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation

Cited by

2019Education for Sustainable Development: Evolution and Perspectives: A Bibliometric Review of Research, 1992–2018 2015Sub-Saharan African Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Research: A Decade of Development 2016Sampling issues in bibliometric analysis 2013Quantitative evaluation of alternative field normalization procedures 2015Predicting Productivity Returns on Investment 2014

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2013How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citationsarticle · 14 shared references 2013How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics: The statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top‐cited papersarticle · 10 shared references 2016Professional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators—a state-of-the-art reportchapter · 9 shared references 2015Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Managementother · 9 shared references 2015Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts?article · 8 shared references 2019Normalisation of citation impact in economicsarticle · 8 shared references

Details

Year2012

Typearticle

Published2012-02-12

VenueEMBO Reports

ISSN-L1469-221X

Languageen

Citations92

Files0 public / 0

Shelfscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Identifiers

doi10.1038/embor.2013.9

openalex_workW2006976978

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

Prior Publication Productivity, Grant Percentile Ranking, and Topic-Normalized Citation Impact of NHLBI Cardiovascular R01 Grants

2013The wisdom of citing scientists

2019Evaluating research and researchers by the journal impact factor: Is it better than coin flipping?