The Impact of Membership in Black Greek-Letter Organizations on Black Students' Involvement in Collegiate Activities and Their Development of Leadership Skills

Abstract

Despite numerous recent events that have cast collegiate Black Greek-letter organizations (BGOs) in negative light, many view these and other organizations as important leadership development vehicles. This article reports on study that examined impact of BGO membership on Black students' involvement in campus-related activities and their leadership development. BGO members and unaffiliated with BGOs attending historically Black and predominantly White institutions of higher education were compared. The results indicate that BGO members, regardless of campus type, evidenced greater student involvement and had more confidence in their leadership skills. They further suggest that BGO membership provides an important means by which to enhance student involvement and leadership development for Blacks in college and beyond. Early leadership experiences provide individuals with tools they need to succeed academically, in workforce, and in other social arenas. Leadership development during collegiate years has been widely studied to determine best methods of enhancing students' leadership skills, and differential processes by which those skills are developed or impeded within various types of student groups (Pascarella & Terenzini, 1991). Despite this broad scrutiny, student leaders remain an understudied component of collegiate population. Research studies variously identify them as student government officers, fraternity and sorority presidents, or residence hall advisors (Pascarella & Terenzini, 1991; Schuh & Laverty, 1983); but conclusive evidence does not exist with regard to how or if these organizations produce leaders. Nor it is clear extent to which collegiate experiences advance students' leadership capabilities, for, as Pascarella and Terenzini argue, without an understanding of students' experiences prior to college, understanding what they have learned in college is difficult if not impossible. What is clear from literature, however, is that concept of student involvement is key to understanding student leadership. Astin (1984, 1985, 1993), who has authored much of literature on this concept and its importance in higher education, defines student involvement as the amount of physical and psychological energy that student devotes to academic experience (Astin, 1984 p. 297). He further notes that a highly involved student is one who, for example, devotes considerable energy to studying, spends lot of time on campus, participates actively in student organizations, and interacts frequently with faculty members and other students (p. 297). Some of results of this involvement, Astin concludes, are greater academic success, lower dropout rates, and development and enhancement of leadership skills. Though much-maligned on many contemporary campuses in United States, Greek-- letter organizations traditionally have been identified as key players in development of leadership skills among college students. As Horowitz (1987) points out, fraternities and sororities have produced some of academe's most visible college leaders. Other researchers have argued that these organizations facilitate perpetual cycle that creates leadership opportunities for their own members while excluding others from similar opportunities (Horowitz, 1987; Shaffer, 1983). Still others insist that through Greek experience, learn how to lead by following excellent role models found within their chapters, and gain additional leadership experiences and skills within their individual chapters and larger community (Hughes & Winston, 1987). Among African Americans, two student collegiate groups-Black student organizations and historically Black Greek-letter organizations (BGOs)-have been found to be benefactors of leadership experiences unique to their cultures and to create unique leadership opportunities for their members (Sedlacek, 1987). …

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 136 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.