SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Editorial: Peer Review and the Editorial Process - A Look Behind the Curtain
8 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Editorial: Peer Review and the Editorial Process - A Look Behind the Curtain (2014)Editorial: Peer Review and the Editorial …Have Levels of Evidence Improved the Quality of Orthopaedic Research? (2013)Have Levels of Evidence Impro…Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial (2012)Does mentoring new peer revie…Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial (2011)Effect of using reporting gui…Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer review: a flawed process…Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Manuscript Quality before and…Effects of Peer Review and Editing on the Readability of Articles Published in Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Effects of Peer Review and Ed…Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism (1990)Peer Review in 18th-Century S…The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific R…Guidelines for Statistical Reporting in Articles for Medical Journals (1988)The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography (2007)The Technique of Clear Writing. (1968)Communication Theories: Origins, Methods, and Uses in the Mass Media (1991)Readers' evaluation of effect of peer review and editing on quality of articles in the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (1996)Improving Parental Involvement (2013)What a difference a colon makes: how superficial factors influence subsequent citation (2013)LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNALS (2005)Publication Rates of Presentations at an Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (2009)Introducing levels of evidence to the journal (2011)An Analysis of References Used for the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination: What are Their Levels of Evidence and Journal Impact Factors? (2014)Levels of Evidence in the Clinical Sports Medicine Literature (2014)Open access publishing: a study of current practices in orthopaedic research (2014)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Establishing a new journal for systematic review products (2012)Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review (2014)Strengthening the Reporting of Molecular Epidemiology for Infectious Diseases (STROME-ID): an extension of the STROBE statement (2014)Complex Problem Solving: Principles and Mechanisms (1992)Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial (2004)The ethics of peer review in bioethics (2013)Complex Problem Solving (2014)Towards the enhancement of quality publication practices in clinical psychological science (2019)A modest proposal to the peer review process: a collaborative and interdisciplinary approach in the assessment of scholarly communication (2021)Scientific peer review (2011)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map (2020)The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review (1990)Effects of Editorial Peer Review (2002)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. (1967)Competing paradigms in qualitative research. (1994)Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1963The Structure of Scientific Revolutions35,276 cited
  • 2006Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals794 cited
  • 1990Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism350 cited
  • 1994Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine324 cited
  • 2011Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial291 cited
  • 1994Effects of Peer Review and Editing on the Readability of Articles Published in Annals of Internal Medicine95 cited
  • 2012Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial89 cited
  • 2013Have Levels of Evidence Improved the Quality of Orthopaedic Research?61 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work