Make-to-forecast: customization with fast delivery

Umit Akinc · Jack R. Meredith

39 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Operations & Production Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Product Development and Customization Supply Chain and Inventory Management Management and Optimization Techniques

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to attempt to achieve customization while maintaining quick delivery to customers by use of a hybrid of make-to-order (MTO) and make-to-stock (MTS) strategies. Design/methodology/approach – The paper reports on various studies based on simulation, optimization, and Markov analysis to respond to some of the unique challenges of the hybrid strategy. Findings – Implementation of the make-to-forecast (MTF) hybrid strategy provides considerable competitive advantage in certain manufacturing situations by achieving as much as 50 percent shorter delivery times for highly customized products than would be possible with a pure MTO strategy. It also has potential to offer competitive advantages to pure MTS and MTO operations. Research limitations/implications – The manufacturing situations, appropriate for MTF paradigm, are fairly complex. The paper reviews only several of the many managerial challenges. For instance, it assumes a given product variety but does not dwell on what the optimum product variety offering should be. Additional research to this and other aspects of the situation is warranted. Practical implications – The paper reports on a real managerial problem. The suggested approaches can be easily implemented by certain manufacturing companies striving to achieve competitive advantage by offering shorter delivery time and substantial customization to their customers. Originality/value – Managing the trade-off between delivery time and degree of customization is not new. Assemble-to-order, mass customization, and postponement strategies have been suggested to soften the trade-off. This paper provides a new paradigm for the same challenge based on pre-release of units into the manufacturing system in anticipation of customer orders.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 39 citations exist upstream.

References

1996Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design 1999Mass customization: The new frontier in business competition 1985Restoring Our Competitive Edge: Competing through Manufacturing.2001Mass customization: Literature review and research directions 1990Lasting improvements in manufacturing performance: In search of a new theory 2013Managing in an age of modularity 1997Managing in an age of modularity.1997Modelling the Costs and Benefits of Delayed Product Differentiation

Cited by

2023An empirical investigation into UK university–industry collaboration: the development of an impact framework 2019Operations managers’ individual competencies for mass customization 2019Co-design and Mass Customization in the Portuguese footwear cluster: an exploratory study 2020Demand-driven supply chain operations management strategies – a literature review and conceptual model 2019Robust order planning with planned orders for multi-variant series production in a production network

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.