Geoffrey Chaucer's Treatise on the Astrolabe

Abstract

Abstract Geoffrey Chaucer's Treatise on the Astrolabe has occasioned varied responses from readers and scholars. John Lydgate's reference, in the Fall of Princes , identified what became the critical terms for reading Chaucer's translation of an instruction manual for using an astrolabe addressed to his “sone” Lowys. Astrolabe survives in more manuscripts than any other Chaucer text with the exception of The Canterbury Tales ; the Variorum edition of the text was published in 2002 and in the last five years critical attention has increasingly refocused on the text. Scholars have considered patterns of readership from extant manuscripts and details, such as the subheading “Brede and Milke for Children,” have reshaped critical analyses. Astrolabe 's language and pedagogical strategies have also been reconceptualized in recent readings. The nature of “science” in the late fourteenth century has always been part of Astrolabe 's critical frame but the cultural valency of astrology has moved into sharper focus producing a more sophisticated analysis of the vernacular context of Chaucer's only scientific prose text.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 5 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.