SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
From conference abstract to full paper: differences between data presented in conferences and journals
5 references·16 citing·47 second hop
From conference abstract to full paper: differences between data presented in conferences and journals (2005)From conference abstract to full paper: d…The fate of neuroradiologic abstracts presented at national meetings in 1993: rate of subsequent publication in peer-reviewed, indexed journals. (1999)The fate of neuroradiologic a…Accuracy of Data in Abstracts of Published Research Articles (1999)Accuracy of Data in Abstracts…Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the orthopaedic research society (1998)Publication rate of abstracts…Can the Accuracy of Abstracts Be Improved by Providing Specific Instructions? (1998)Can the Accuracy of Abstracts…Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Manuscript Quality before and…Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC) (2020)Reporting of methodological s…Frequency of Abstracts Presented at Eye and Vision Conferences Being Developed Into Full-Length Publications (2020)Frequency of Abstracts Presen…The state and development of research in the field of gifted education over 60 years: A bibliometric study of four gifted education journals (1957–2017) (2019)The state and development of …Conference abstracts describing systematic reviews on pain were selectively published, not reliable, and poorly reported (2019)Conference abstracts describi…Search for unpublished data by systematic reviewers: an audit (2017)Search for unpublished data b…A scoping review of comparisons between abstracts and full reports in primary biomedical research (2017)A scoping review of compariso…Publication rate of studies presented at veterinary anaesthesia specialty meetings during the years 2003–2008 (2015)Publication rate of studies p…Discrepancies Between Meeting Abstracts and Subsequent Full Text Publications in Hand Surgery (2014)Discrepancies Between Meeting…Current findings from research on structured abstracts: an update (2014)Current findings from researc…The quality of reporting and publication status of vaccines trials presented at veterinary conferences from 1988 to 2003 (2010)The quality of reporting and …Comparison of outcomes and other variables between conference abstracts and subsequent peer-reviewed papers involving pre-harvest or abattoir-level interventions against foodborne pathogens (2010)Comparison of outcomes and ot…Analysis of trends in the full publication of papers from conference abstracts involving pre-harvest or abattoir-level interventions against foodborne pathogens (2010)Analysis of trends in the ful…Time to full publication of studies of anti-cancer medicines for breast cancer and the potential for publication bias: a short systematic review (2008)Time to full publication of s…Peer review in open access scientific journals. (2007)Peer review in open access sc…Better reporting of randomized trials in biomedical journal and conference abstracts (2007)Better reporting of randomize…Clinical decision-making based on findings presented in conference abstracts: is it safe for our patients? (2006)Clinical decision-making base…The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Publication Rates of Abstracts Presented at Annual Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Meetings (2003)Publication rates of abstracts presented at annual scientific meetings: How does the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists compare? (2004)Subsequent Publication of Orally Presented Original Studies within 5 Years after 1995 RSNA Scientific Assembly (2004)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Guidelines for Statistical Reporting in Articles for Medical Journals (1988)The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography (2007)Fate of Cardiology Research Originally Published in Abstract Form (1980)Full Publication of Results Initially Presented in Abstracts (1994)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis (1994)Publication of Abstracts Submitted to the Annual Meeting of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)An introduction to systematic reviews in animal health, animal welfare, and food safety (2014)Evidence of improved reporting of swine vaccination trials in the post-REFLECT statement publication period (2019)Invited review: Completeness of reporting of experiments: REFLECTing on a year of animal trials in the Journal of Dairy Science (2019)Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association. (1994)Systematic reviews in epidemiology: why are we so far behind? (2002)Adoption of structured abstracts by general medical journals and format for a structured abstract. (2005)Method and reporting quality in health professions education research: a systematic review (2011)The case for structuring the discussion of scientific papers (1999)CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (2013)Writing an Abstract for a Research Manuscript: Providing an Honest, Succinct and Complete Summary. (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses for abstracts: best practice for reporting abstracts of systematic reviews in Endodontology (2019)Title, abstract and keywords: a practical guide to maximize the visibility and impact of academic papers (2024)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)Spinning the Genome: Why Science Hype Matters (2018)Reporting quality and spin in abstracts of randomized clinical trials of periodontal therapy and cardiovascular disease outcomes (2020)Can We Trust Creativity Tests? A Review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT) (2006)Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education (2011)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Assessing the Scholarly Reach of Terman’s Work (2020)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Progress and challenges of network meta‐analysis (2021)Adherence to the PRISMA statement and its association with risk of bias in systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals: A meta-research study (2022)Completeness of Reporting Is Suboptimal in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Rehabilitation Journals, With Trials With Low Risk of Bias Displaying Better Reporting: A Meta-research Study (2022)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1994Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine324 cited
  • 1999Accuracy of Data in Abstracts of Published Research Articles300 cited
  • 1999The fate of neuroradiologic abstracts presented at national meetings in 1993: rate of subsequent publication in peer-reviewed, indexed journals.109 cited
  • 1998Can the Accuracy of Abstracts Be Improved by Providing Specific Instructions?104 cited
  • 1998Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the orthopaedic research society91 cited

Cited by

  • 2017A scoping review of comparisons between abstracts and full reports in primary biomedical research75 cited
  • 2020Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC)72 cited
  • 2014Current findings from research on structured abstracts: an update51 cited
  • 2019The state and development of research in the field of gifted education over 60 years: A bibliometric study of four gifted education journals (1957–2017)39 cited
  • 2010The quality of reporting and publication status of vaccines trials presented at veterinary conferences from 1988 to 200338 cited
  • 2007Better reporting of randomized trials in biomedical journal and conference abstracts38 cited
  • 2014Discrepancies Between Meeting Abstracts and Subsequent Full Text Publications in Hand Surgery34 cited
  • 2017

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Search for unpublished data by systematic reviewers: an audit
32 cited
  • 2006Clinical decision-making based on findings presented in conference abstracts: is it safe for our patients?29 cited
  • 2010Analysis of trends in the full publication of papers from conference abstracts involving pre-harvest or abattoir-level interventions against foodborne pathogens21 cited
  • 2008Time to full publication of studies of anti-cancer medicines for breast cancer and the potential for publication bias: a short systematic review21 cited
  • 2015Publication rate of studies presented at veterinary anaesthesia specialty meetings during the years 2003–200818 cited
  • 2010Comparison of outcomes and other variables between conference abstracts and subsequent peer-reviewed papers involving pre-harvest or abattoir-level interventions against foodborne pathogens18 cited
  • 2019Conference abstracts describing systematic reviews on pain were selectively published, not reliable, and poorly reported18 cited
  • 2020Frequency of Abstracts Presented at Eye and Vision Conferences Being Developed Into Full-Length Publications13 cited
  • 2007Peer review in open access scientific journals.12 cited