Human resource development roles and competencies in five European countries

Abstract

This article compares HRD practitioners’ self‐assessments based on their work roles, outputs and competencies from England, the Netherlands, Italy, Germany and Finland. The comparison is based on results produced by European surveys conducted between 1992–96, which adopted their model from an earlier study of HRD practitioners in the USA. In terms of work roles, the findings showed the culture‐bound nature of HRD work and also, through the appearance of new work roles, its close relation to changes in working life. English and the Finnish HRD practitioners in particular, seemed to perceive themselves as agents of change while for the Germans, the role of trainer still seemed valid. In terms of their competencies, HRD practitioners seem to represent a broad‐based and development‐oriented source of expertise. Further‐more, despite their diverse roles, HRD practitioners seem to require a common core competence. It is this which enables them to identify the needs and problems of individuals and of the organisation, to promote and analyse the developmental processes, as well as to manage interactional relations.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 33 citations exist upstream.