Articlebronze2006

Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical evidence against a common practice

684 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Epidemiology & Community Health

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Health disparities and outcomes Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies Public Health and Social Inequalities

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Education, income, and occupational class are often used interchangeably in studies showing social inequalities in health. This procedure implies that all three characteristics measure the same underlying phenomena. This paper questions this practice. The study looked for any independent effects of education, income, and occupational class on four health outcomes: diabetes prevalence, myocardial infarction incidence and mortality, and finally all cause mortality in populations from Sweden and Germany. DESIGN: Sweden: follow up of myocardial infarction mortality and all cause mortality in the entire population, based on census linkage to the Cause of Death Registry. Germany: follow up of myocardial infarction morbidity and all cause mortality in statutory health insurance data, plus analysis of prevalence data on diabetes. Multiple regression analyses were performed to calculate the effects of education, income, and occupational class before and after mutual adjustments. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Sweden (all residents aged 25-64) and Germany (Mettman district, Nordrhein-Westfalen, all insured persons aged 25-64). MAIN RESULTS: Correlations between education, income, and occupational class were low to moderate. Which of these yielded the strongest effects on health depended on type of health outcome in question. For diabetes, education was the strongest predictor and for all cause mortality it was income. Myocardial infarction morbidity and mortality showed a more mixed picture. In mutually adjusted analyses each social dimension had an independent effect on each health outcome in both countries. CONCLUSIONS: Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably as indicators of a hypothetical latent social dimension. Although correlated, they measure different phenomena and tap into different causal mechanisms.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 684 citations exist upstream.

References

1997Measuring Social Class in US Public Health Research: Concepts, Methodologies, and Guidelines 1983Inequalities in Health, The Black Report 1988THE MEASUREMENT OF SOCIAL CLASS IN EPIDEMIOLOGY 2004“Fundamental Causes” of Social Inequalities in Mortality: A Test of the Theory 2000Socioeconomic Position 1998Education and occupational social class: which is the more important indicator of mortality risk?

Cited by

2008Does a higher educational level protect against anxiety and depression? The HUNT study 2017A meta‐analysis of the relationship between socioeconomic status and executive function performance among children 2012Neural correlates of socioeconomic status in the developing human brain 2009Social Class Differentials in Health and Mortality: Patterns and Explanations in Comparative Perspective 2012Socioeconomic status and cognitive functioning: moving from correlation to causation 2017Different indicators of socioeconomic status and their relative importance as determinants of health in old age 2008Cultural capital and social inequality in health

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.