Gender and Lowi's Thesis: Implications for Career Advancement

Meredith Ann Newman

128 citations0/0 files storedPublic Administration Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Gender Diversity and Inequality Public Policy and Administration Research Gender Politics and Representation

Abstract

What variables should we manipulate to improve the status of women in public administration? Meredith Newman looks beyond gender as an explanatory variable, to an examination of the nature of state organizations, and the extent to which opportunity structures differ according to an agency's mission. Newman concludes that organizations are not created equal. The work environment of each of Lowi's agency types is distinctive, and predicts leadership styles, and patterns of career advancement.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 128 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2006Unequal Pay: The Role of Gender 2020Equal Employment Opportunity: Women Bureaucrats in Male‐Dominated Professions 1999A National Study of Gender-Based Occupational Segregation in Municipal Bureaucracies: Persistence of Glass Walls?2006Cracked Ceilings, Firmer Floors, and Weakening Walls: Trends and Patterns in Gender Representation among Executives Leading American State Agencies, 1970?2000 2011Some Ceilings Have More Cracks 2001The Gendered Bureaucracy 2009Gender and Organizational Rule Abidance 2018Inclusive Work Practices: Turnover Intentions Among LGBT Employees of the U.S. Federal Government

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.