Article1985

Multiple Perspectives: Overcoming the Weaknesses of MS/OR

34 citations0/0 files storedINFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Complex Systems and Decision Making Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications Information Systems Theories and Implementation

Abstract

The paradigms of science deal with well-structured systems successfully. However, they are quite inadequate for complex sociotechnical systems. The multiple perspective concept, originally suggested by Allison, effectively bridges the gap between analysis and the real world of ill-structured systems. Three types of perspective are used: technical/analytical; organizational/societal; and personal/individual. Each provides important insights not obtainable with the others.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 34 citations exist upstream.

References

1975Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases 1972Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis 1972Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis 1973World dynamics 1979Forecasting: An appraisal for policy-makers and planners 1982Decision-Making at the Top 1985Multiple Perspectives for Decision-Making 1968Management and machiavelli

Cited by

2011A comprehensive assessment of solar photovoltaic technologies: Literature review 2000Towards synergy in multiperspective management: An American–Chinese case

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.